WeChat is indeed different from Weixin. But according to multiple
sources[a] they use the same package and switch versions on login
depending on your registered phone number. And WeChat on the US Apple
App Store has no problem logging in and using a Chinese "Weixin" account.
[a]: https://www.z
Hey,
Packages are only considered duplicate if there aren't any actual
differences. Packages that have real differences (see official electron
app -bin's vs versions that adapt to use Arch's electron) won't be
deleted. However, the recent new packages created on the AUR other than
Kiwiblock's
I don't understand what you mean. Kimiblock has been the maintainer of
wechat-uos-qt and wechat-bwrap-something since I started using arch a
year ago. The merged "wechat" is just one less package, and the vanilla
“原汁原味儿” wechat-bin was already restored 4 days ago. I don't understand
all the upr
> Hello, I'm 7Ji, maintainer of wechat-universal-bwrap[a] (wrongly typed as
wechat-universal in Kimiblock's original mail), and co-maintainer of
wechat-beta-bwrap[b]. leaeasy[c], the maintainer of -beta, is my friend. I
think it's necessary for me to clear up some misunderstanding and introduce
the
(sorry about the formatting. resend)
It's good that this is an open discussion so we can get all the facts
and misinformation presented for everyone to see and judge.
Let's get the main points addressed first. Details are next.
This is the subject of this discussion and the main points are abo
It's good that this is an open discussion so we can get all the facts
and misinformation presented for everyone to see and judge.
Let's get the main points addressed first. Details are next.
This is the subject of this discussion and the main points are about:
** AUR guideline on `Duplicate` pa
On Thu, 2025-01-02 at 18:05 +0100, Robin Candau wrote:
>
> As said above, this situation has been going for months and is
> particularly difficult to deal with.
> We have multiple separate mail threads about the overall situation
> and
> most comments on the AUR are not written in English which
On 1/2/25 3:57 PM, S Umple wrote:
Recently there's been a debacle about the wechat packaging in AUR.
"Recently" is an interesting word choice, this "debacle" has been going
for months [1]...
Essentially there were two competing packages wechat and wechat-bin [1]
which are both popular. Pack
it's quite sus that such great effort was taken just for the sake of being
a maintainer (which is a non-paid volunteer role) of some package.
i think some sort of security audit should take place to fully clarify this
situation, because such pattern strongly remind some sort of social
engineering h
Hello,
First, there's no need to shorten our names. It's not something like a
prohibited word.
aur/wechat was wechat-uos-bwrap and wechat-uos-qt respectively before.
They are merged into wechat on that very day because I'm busy doing
other stuff before that and rushing will probably result i
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 10:11:31AM -0500, S Umple wrote:
JFC.
All y'all sound like a bunch of petulant teens that got their phones
taken away.
Simple solution to all of this BS drama:
1. Copy PKGBUILD to your machine.
2. Edit said PKGBUILD to your needs.
3. Build and install it using the Ar
Update [4]
On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 9:57 AM S Umple wrote:
> Recently there's been a debacle about the wechat packaging in AUR.
> Essentially there were two competing packages wechat and wechat-bin [1]
> which are both popular. Package maintainer K(type user in AUR) of wechat
> took unbelievable m
Recently there's been a debacle about the wechat packaging in AUR.
Essentially there were two competing packages wechat and wechat-bin [1]
which are both popular. Package maintainer K(type user in AUR) of wechat
took unbelievable measures to try to get rid of wechat-bin from AUR to
begin with and w
13 matches
Mail list logo
