Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread George Rawlinson via aur-general
On 22-04-22 10:42, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > I think I'll be re-uploading unless you can show me > where this violates the rules. No need, both packages have been restored. They do not have a maintainer, so feel free to pick them back up. -- George Rawlinson signature.asc Descripti

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Marcel Röthke via aur-general
On 2022-04-22 08:31:27, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > Secondly, please remember that TUs exist to actually "force" our views onto > everyone via quality control. Is that so? In my understanding the TUs job is to enforce the criteria laid out in the submission rules not your personal opin

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Jonas Witschel via aur-general
On 2022-04-22 10:42, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > [...] As such, I think I'll be re-uploading unless you can show me > where this violates the rules. Without going into the details of this dispute, I will point out that this is not how the AUR works: the Trusted Users are the moderators o

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:31:27 -0700 Brett Cornwall wrote: > On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > >Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These > >are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people > >want to know why [1].

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2022-04-22 09:58, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people want to know why [1]. They do not violate any AUR rules and have been available in the AUR

[aur-general] Deletion of vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks

2022-04-22 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
Recently vi-vim-symlink and neovim-symlinks were deleted from the AUR. These are used by a lot of people to set up their systems, and a lot of people want to know why [1]. They do not violate any AUR rules and have been available in the AUR for a very long time, well over 6 years for neovim-symlink