On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, at 17:07, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> On 2022-02-07 13:33, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
- buildozer
>>>
>>> This seems to not use the AUR bazelisk package for building, but a
>>> release from github? Why doesn't it use the AUR package?
>>
>>I like to ke
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022, at 14:22, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
> On 2022-02-17 11:59, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
>>No, it's pretty straightforward, but note that being "closed source" and/or
>>"difficult to compile from source" are not qualifying factors for determining
>>whether
On 2022-02-07 16:07, Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote:
On 2022-02-07 13:33, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
- buildozer
This seems to not use the AUR bazelisk package for building, but a
release from github? Why doesn't it use the AUR package?
I like to keep things simple for users.
On 2022-02-17 11:59, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote:
No, it's pretty straightforward, but note that being "closed source" and/or
"difficult to compile from source" are not qualifying factors for determining whether or
not a package should be moved to community.
I'm not arguing that `kind-
No, it's pretty straightforward, but note that being "closed source" and/or
"difficult to compile from source" are not qualifying factors for determining
whether or not a package should be moved to community.
I'm not arguing that `kind-bin` _should absolutely_ be moved to community,
simply that
Il 29/01/22 23:27, Ben Denhartog via aur-general ha scritto:
> # AUR packages that I'll move to community
[...]
- kind (`kind-bin`)
Hello, kind is open source and hosted on github, is there any problem
compiling it from source?
