[aur-general] Review for sshs

2022-02-07 Thread Nathanael Demacon via aur-general
Hi, I created a package that I’ll maintain and I’m wondering if you could review it to be pushed to the community repository. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sshs Thanks,

Re: [aur-general] TU application for sudoforge

2022-02-07 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2022-02-07 13:33, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote: - buildozer This seems to not use the AUR bazelisk package for building, but a release from github? Why doesn't it use the AUR package? I like to keep things simple for users. For AUR packages, that means trying to avoid depending on

Re: [aur-general] TU application for sudoforge

2022-02-07 Thread Ben Denhartog via aur-general
>> # AUR packages that I'll move to community > > Some notes on the proposed packages: > >> - bazelisk > > No offense, but the Github description made me think, "now I have bazel > and Golang, now I have three problems". I'm not sure I follow you. Bazelisk is written in Golang, sure, but it's a t

Re: [aur-general] TU application for sudoforge

2022-02-07 Thread Jelle van der Waa via aur-general
Hi, On 29/01/2022 23:27, Ben Denhartog via aur-general wrote: Hello good people and fellow miscreants, My name is Benjamin Denhartog, better known as sudoforge [0], and I'd like to formally submit an application to become a TU. I've maintained a few AUR packages for a while now [1], and you've