Hi,
I'm the TU that recommended this.
On 24.08.21 17:12, Mikhail f. Shiryaev via aur-general wrote:
Hello.
Today I tried to build ruby-rubocop [1] package and it's in a strange
state. A lot of packages for the package are cross-dependent for the check,
for example ruby-ruby-progressbar [2] and
On 8/24/21 11:12 AM, Mikhail f. Shiryaev via aur-general wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I tried to build ruby-rubocop [1] package and it's in a strange
> state. A lot of packages for the package are cross-dependent for the check,
> for example ruby-ruby-progressbar [2] and ruby-fuubar [3]. The proposal
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:57:19 +0300, Radislav Golubtsov wrote:
>[1] http://dist.schmorp.de
Perhaps just a temporarily unavailability?
[rocketmouse@archlinux rxvt]$ wget
http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-9.26.tar.bz2{,.sig}
--2021-08-25 03:03:57--
http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unic
Thank you, Nick, too for your proposals,
But what’s regarding unavailability of Mark Lehmann’s website and those URxvt
tarballs from my side is probably caused by network problems, as Caleb supposed
to be — maybe my ISP provider has blocked his website [1], that is very-very
strange thing.))
Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general left as an exercise for the reader:
> What’s regarding your proposal instead of URxvt (Better Wheel Scrolling) —
> Alacritty [3] — I’d indeed, definitely have to try it out. Thank you for a
> suggestion.
I highly recommend giving Kitty and WezTerm (especially t
Wednesday, August 25, 2021 6:09 AM +11:00 from Caleb Maclennan
:
> On 2021-08-24 21:55, Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general wrote:
> What to do now with this, guys? — Maybe some of you know where to get
> aforementined URxvt tarball (another URL, publicly advertised, or
> someone hosted it on th
On 2021-08-24 21:55, Radislav Golubtsov via aur-general wrote:
What to do now with this, guys? — Maybe some of you know where to get
aforementined URxvt tarball (another URL, publicly advertised, or
someone hosted it on their website).
The current version of rxvt-unicode is 9.26. The upstream s
Hi guys,
First of all, I’d like to say, I’m a long-time and happy user of the URxvt
terminal emulator and more precisely — of its AUR package
"rxvt-unicode-better-wheel-scrolling" [1]. It’s the very good complement to a
WM of my choice (Window Maker) for many years.
From aside, I didn’t upd
On 2021-08-24 19:11, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera via aur-general wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, at 15:12, Mikhail f. Shiryaev via aur-general
wrote:
The same is valid for package ruby-rubocop-performance [6] that is
dependency for rubocop check and requires it to be built
There's not really much that ca
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021, at 15:12, Mikhail f. Shiryaev via aur-general wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today I tried to build ruby-rubocop [1] package and it's in a strange
> state. A lot of packages for the package are cross-dependent for the check,
> for example ruby-ruby-progressbar [2] and ruby-fuubar [3].
Hello.
Today I tried to build ruby-rubocop [1] package and it's in a strange
state. A lot of packages for the package are cross-dependent for the check,
for example ruby-ruby-progressbar [2] and ruby-fuubar [3]. The proposal of
how to solve it from Mario [4] is to skip the check() phase, see comme
11 matches
Mail list logo
