Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread alad via aur-general
On 24/05/2021 15:05, Manhong Dai wrote: On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:11 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software? And what even is this??? ... The orginal discussion was already conc

Re: [aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

2021-05-24 Thread Manhong Dai via aur-general
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 09:11 +0200, Miguel Revilla Rodríguez via aur- general wrote: > El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 17:12, Manhong Dai via aur-general (< > aur-general@lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > > > > > I would fully agree with you if the patch file doesn't include any > > original > > source

Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread Manhong Dai via aur-general
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:11 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote: > On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > > Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software? > > And > > what even is this??? > > > > ... > > The orginal discussion was already concluded with [1]. Th

Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread Manhong Dai via aur-general
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 07:43 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 5/22/21 4:35 PM, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > > I fully agree with that the copyright holder doesn't have any ground > > if > he > > is complaining about that the package maintainer shouldn't modify it. > > > > Bu

Re: [aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread alad via aur-general
On 24/05/2021 13:43, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: Who is this about? The noisetorch software, or the sge software? And what even is this??? ... The orginal discussion was already concluded with [1]. The ongoing discussion of sge, initiated by Manhong, is completely unrelated and nothi

[aur-general] ...

2021-05-24 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 5/22/21 4:35 PM, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote: > I fully agree with that the copyright holder doesn't have any ground if he > is complaining about that the package maintainer shouldn't modify it. > > But if he is complaining about how the patch file should be distributed, I > think he do

Re: [aur-general] Notification of GPL violation

2021-05-24 Thread Miguel Revilla Rodríguez via aur-general
El dom, 23 may 2021 a las 17:12, Manhong Dai via aur-general (< aur-general@lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > > I would fully agree with you if the patch file doesn't include any original > source code. > > Then we only have to start using xdelta instead of diff to create the patches and we will b