On 10/30/18 02:51pm, Ethan Rakoff wrote:
Remember that as technical people working on a project that spans the
world, we communicate almost exclusively through text, and it can be
easy to misinterpret the tone of someone else. We should all make an
effort to remember this in writing and in read
SORRY ABOUT THAT. I meant to send that directly to Giancarlo.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:48 PM Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Em outubro 30, 2018 16:07 Ralf Mardorf escreveu:
> > Apparently this TU has got special rights. That he could behave like
> > thi
17:16 grazzolini, but we're finally getting somewhere :\
17:37 grazzolini, the reason it continues is because they're an
underlying problem we're trying to solve
17:37 that's long overdue
17:38 there's*
17:38 I'm afraid this is just a temporary band-aid
17:39 eg. I just rejoined #archlinux-of
Hi,
On 30-10-18, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
> Em outubro 30, 2018 16:07 Ralf Mardorf escreveu:
> > Apparently this TU has got special rights. That he could behave like
> > this again and again does strengthen him to continue doing it.
> >
> This thread has lived much longer than i
Em outubro 30, 2018 16:07 Ralf Mardorf escreveu:
Apparently this TU has got special rights. That he could behave like
this again and again does strengthen him to continue doing it.
This thread has lived much longer than it's purpose. Let's stop this right now.
I'm placing this list into emerge
Hi,
I read all related mails, but neither replied to the mailing list, nor
off-list until now. Now I'll add a single comment.
The TU writing this reply
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-October/034408.html
is malignant manipulative. Instead of assuming good faith, he opens
I think that is the most fair assessment of the situation that I have read
today.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:48 PM Connor Behan via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 2018-10-30 01:23 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:06 PM Daniel Capella
> > wrote:
On 2018-10-30 01:23 PM, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 1:06 PM Daniel Capella
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:02 PM Adam Levy
>> wrote:
>>> Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct?
>>>
>>> It seems to me that these three rules in particular are relevan
The only rule there that strikes me as potentially having been violated is
"respect other users". But I think that cuts both ways in this case to be
perfectly honest. It could be argued that Konstantin did not respect the
existing TUs initial responses to his questions. But that's debatable.
The m
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:02 PM Adam Levy
wrote:
> Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct?
>
> It seems to me that these three rules in particular are relevant in this
> case and were not respected: "Respect other users", "Do not flame" and "Be
> responsible".
>
> Baptiste
--
Bes
Being curt and direct is against the code of conduct?
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:54 PM Daniel Capella wrote:
> hate crimes and physical violence*
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Daniel Capella
> wrote:
>
>> > *b. *to distort or twist the sense or intention of: the reporters did
>> violence to
hate crimes and physical violence*
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:53 PM Daniel Capella
wrote:
> > *b. *to distort or twist the sense or intention of: the reporters did
> violence to my speech.
>
> Violent speech, at least of late, is more defined as inciting hate crimes
> and actual violence. Perhaps
> *b. *to distort or twist the sense or intention of: the reporters did
violence to my speech.
Violent speech, at least of late, is more defined as inciting hate crimes
and actual violence. Perhaps we should use "cruel" here.
> In fact if you are repeatedly trying to complain about something that
Apologies for my mis-formatted email. You may need to expand the
quoted text to read it. I think I goofed it.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:52 AM Adam Levy
wrote:
>
> > Even if you are 100% correct, there were a lot of other messages, not
> > just the linked ones.
>
> First I want to mention that I di
> Even if you are 100% correct, there were a lot of other messages, not
> just the linked ones.
First I want to mention that I did in fact read all of the emails, but
presumably someone trying to make a point about bullying in those
emails would have linked to the most contentious ones. So those a
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:27:09PM +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> Now that the discussion period is over, I am taking time to fully answer
> this, since it's much more general and important than the TU application
> itself.
Hi Baptiste.
I read your email, and I do agree with y
Just thought I would cap this whole shebang off with this:
Remember that as technical people working on a project that spans the world, we
communicate almost exclusively through text, and it can be easy to misinterpret
the tone of someone else. We should all make an effort to remember this in
w
I will make this as brief as I can, even though I feel there is a lot to
talk about.
On 30/10/2018 13:06, Adam Levy via aur-general wrote:
> As an outsider sitting on the sidelines, with absolutely no dog in this
> fight, I have to say that I don't believe that the messages you linked are
> exampl
As an outsider sitting on the sidelines, with absolutely no dog in this
fight, I have to say that I don't believe that the messages you linked are
examples of bullying or personal attacks. The closest I saw to a personal
attack might be Eli saying that Konstantin is a control freak. I believe
that
Hi Santiago,
Now that the discussion period is over, I am taking time to fully answer
this, since it's much more general and important than the TU application
itself.
On 28-10-18, Santiago Torres-Arias wrote:
> I've been following this email thread quite closely and without
> participating as I w
20 matches
Mail list logo
