[aur-general] [PATCH][tu-bylaws]: raise threshold of sponsors to two

2019-01-07 Thread Santiago Torres via aur-general
The current threshold of applicants has raised some concerns with the TU community regarding the quality of the applications submitted. In order to improve this, increase the threshold of TU sponsors with the following goals: - Have two TUs review the applicants PKBUILDs - Have two TUs actually de

Re: [aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

2019-01-07 Thread JereBear via aur-general
> BTW I did submit > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2019-January/004619.html > which I think should fix this. Thanks!

Re: [aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

2019-01-07 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 1/7/19 1:20 PM, JereBear wrote: >> Also I think all previous cases of people using local:// in a PKGBUILD >> did not use "/filename", so we were happily parsing it as an authority. >> You've actually broken the aurweb in a practical way by actually caring >> about the RFC. :D > > That's gratify

Re: [aur-general] package review request: gog-pyre

2019-01-07 Thread JereBear via aur-general
> Also I think all previous cases of people using local:// in a PKGBUILD > did not use "/filename", so we were happily parsing it as an authority. > You've actually broken the aurweb in a practical way by actually caring > about the RFC. :D That's gratifying! This bug appears to affect only the a