Am 2016-02-13 17:17, schrieb Luchesar V. ILIEV:
If we need to update this email address in your database, should we
open
a ticket or simply send a note to mirr...@archlinux.org?
Either is fine.
I'll probably make that the official policy because the bug tracker is
really cumbersome for these
Great, thanks, Florian! Just one question though...
On 13/02/16 11:01, Florian Pritz wrote:
> I am not creating a list for mails from us to all admins because there
> is really no need for you guys to keep the mailman subscription up to
> date when we have all mail addresses in our database. All i
Hi,
Thanks for all the input. I have decided that a two list setup is
sufficient and now created the arch-mirrors-announce list. The new lists
work like this:
- arch-mirrors: Discussion about anything related to mirrors.
Membership is not required for anyone any more (this includes mirror
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:39:32PM +0100, Florian Pritz wrote:
> As for the mirror-admin-to-AL-admin case I think it's probably best if
> I publish the direct admin email I gave you. I'm unsure as to why you
> think this is mixed with the discussion list. The discussion list is
> really just intend
I propose there are only two mailing lists: the general discussion one and the
announcements, which is only AL => subscribers. This one could even be an
internal one, like a list of addresses, and not a real mailing list. This means
it's mandatory. It should include all mirror admins, whose address
On 03.02.2016 23:00, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> On 03/02/16 21:39, Florian Pritz wrote:
> I'm afraid I didn't understand that "open for posting from anyone": you
> mean also open for non-subscribers? Because I think most/all discussion
> lists are already open for posting for anyone who's subscribe
On 03/02/16 21:39, Florian Pritz wrote:
> I'd also consider making the discussion list entirely open for posting
> from anyone, but this would not be in line with all our other lists so
> it would require some more discussion across all lists first. I dislike
> the idea of having different policies
On 03.02.2016 17:47, Carsten Otto wrote:
> I like your proposal of splitting up the list. Having one list - no
> matter the name - where only AL admins post seems to be a good idea for
> certain announcements. Most projects have this, and I'm perfectly fine
> with that.
>
> Having another list for
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:47:47PM +0100, Carsten Otto wrote:
> However, I don't really like mixing up the discussion and the
> mirror-admin-to-AL-admin cases. In the first case some kind of
> subscription is quite OK, but in the second case I as a mirror admin
> don't see the advantage of subscrib
Hi Florian,
thank you for working on this issue.
I like your proposal of splitting up the list. Having one list - no
matter the name - where only AL admins post seems to be a good idea for
certain announcements. Most projects have this, and I'm perfectly fine
with that.
Having another list for m
Hello Everyone
Robert Johnson is deceased. He died on 8/1/2015.
His wife,
Constance Stallard
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Florian Pritz
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 7:58 AM
To: Arch Linux Mirroring Discussion and Announcements
On 01.02.2016 20:22, Luchesar V.
On 01.02.2016 20:22, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote:
> Blame it on my FreeBSD past (and part present), but I actually prefer
> the short generic name to be used for discussions (i.e. arch-mirrors@),
> while the announcements-only list to be named accordingly (e.g.
> arch-mirrors-announce@). This would per
On 01/02/16 19:15, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Some admins have told me that they are not interested in traffic
> regarding other mirrors. I tried to keep such traffic away from the
> mailing list, but I have the feeling that it would probably be better to
> simply split the list.
>
> I propose the fol
On 02/01/2016 07:15 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose the following two lists:
>
> - arch-mirrors:
No need..
>
> - arch-mirrors-discussion: General discussion list. Our users might be
> subscribed here. Mirror admins can use it to send mail regarding
> downtime or user facing chang
Hi,
Some admins have told me that they are not interested in traffic
regarding other mirrors. I tried to keep such traffic away from the
mailing list, but I have the feeling that it would probably be better to
simply split the list.
I propose the following two lists:
- arch-mirrors: List that m
15 matches
Mail list logo
