Hi,
FWIW In fact, Polarian has sent an average of 2.3 (small sized)
emails/day to this mailing list for the last 30 days [1]. It's
apparently a (denial of service) mailbombing attack. Hard to believe the
server wasn't overloaded.
;)
Regards,
Ralf
[1]
"The following statistics are from the past
> On 4. Feb 2023, at 14:54, Andy Pieters wrote:
>
> I do not think that we need to single out the person with autism and tell
> them to walk on eggshells, do we?
Strong agreement. I think, there was much more noise because of people
complaining about noise than because of maybe one or two emai
Hi ogarcia,
> > your mails are single-handedly flooding my list mbox - please be
> > mindful of others when interacting with mailing lists, perhaps
> > collate your emails into fewer.
>
> you could criticize Polarian for some things, but complaining that you
> get a lot of mail on a mailing list i
On Friday, 3 February 2023 at 06:34 (-0500), Genes Lists wrote:
On 2/3/23 05:03, ogar...@moire.org wrote:
I don't suppose you have a similar replacement for my other
dependency on the bind package, dnssec-signzone?
As a command I personally do not know of any replacement. But if you
simply u
On 2/3/23 05:03, ogar...@moire.org wrote:
I don't suppose you have a similar replacement for my other dependency
on the bind package, dnssec-signzone?
As a command I personally do not know of any replacement. But if you simply use
`dnssec-signzone` to check the DNSSEC status of a domain you c
On Fri, 2023-02-03 at 09:11 +, ogar...@moire.org wrote:
> if you don't like that people expose their ideas and answer to what
> they receive, unsubscribe
Hi,
the suggestion to leave the mailing list is just as wrong as whining
about too many probably unnecessary e-mails.
It's very easy to fi
> No, I need to actually locally sign zonefiles for my own DNSSEC. Then
> even `resolvectl query` (part of base!) can check their DNSSEC status.
No, I don't know anything. It is not an operation that I do either, so I cannot
contribute much in this case :-(
On Friday, 3 February 2023 at 10:03 (+), ogar...@moire.org wrote:
I don't suppose you have a similar replacement for my other
dependency on the bind package, dnssec-signzone?
As a command I personally do not know of any replacement. But if you
simply use `dnssec-signzone` to check the DNSS
> Thanks, drill seems like a nice replacement. Though, these days I find
> myself using `resolvectl query` for most simple tests.
>
> I don't suppose you have a similar replacement for my other dependency
> on the bind package, dnssec-signzone?
As a command I personally do not know of any repla
On Friday, 3 February 2023 at 09:03 (+), ogar...@moire.org wrote:
I install bind for the use of dig.
You can use `drill`[1] instead of `dig` and avoid installing anything
(as long as you have OpenSSH installed, which, dare I say it, is a
must). It may seem a little strange at first, but i
On 03.02.23 10:11, ogar...@moire.org wrote:
Man, you could criticize Polarian for some things, but complaining that you get
a lot of mail on a mailing list is the most absurd thing I've read in a long
time.
Without any acrimony, if you don't like that people expose their ideas and
answer to w
> your mails are single-handedly flooding my list mbox - please be mindful
> of others when interacting with mailing lists, perhaps collate your
> emails into fewer.
Man, you could criticize Polarian for some things, but complaining that you get
a lot of mail on a mailing list is the most absur
> I install bind for the use of dig.
You can use `drill`[1] instead of `dig` and avoid installing anything (as long
as you have OpenSSH installed, which, dare I say it, is a must). It may seem a
little strange at first, but it's essentially the same thing.
[1]: https://linux.die.net/man/1/drill
13 matches
Mail list logo
