On maandag 19 september 2022 22:16:10 CEST Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:46 +0200, Reto wrote:
> > > For example, if you have got a virtual search folder with a filter, that
> > > searches the email bodies for "x11" in folders for different mailing
> > > lists, it can be very helpf
On Sun, 2022-09-18 at 11:46 +0200, Reto wrote:
> > For example, if you have got a virtual search folder with a filter, that
> > searches the email bodies for "x11" in folders for different mailing
> > lists, it can be very helpful, if the subject lines mention "[arch-
> > general] ", "[Alsa-user] "
FYI for list administrators
Now that mail list is properly DKIM & DMARC friendly I was a bit
surprised to see these 2 DMARC rejections in mail logs today;
one from 5:21 EDT and same thing again at 5:31:
Perhaps its helpful.
...
client=lists.archlinux.org[95.217.236.249]
message-id=<4f840dc0
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Dear mailing list admin,
> Please add "[arch-general] " to the subject.
Please don't. Removing that and keeping the dkim signature intact is
a good thing.
The goal should be that we can reject any dkim failing messages and the
only t
PS:
My apologies, I didn't notice that "For managing your subscriptions a
new mailman3 account [must be registered]".
Dear mailing list admin,
while I still received emails from the mailing list, I couldn't log in.
After (re-)subscribing I can log in again.
Please add "[arch-general] " to the subject.
Some mailing lists don't use such an identifier in the subject, but a
lot of mailing lists for good
