Hi everyone again,
I started opening an issue on the Arch bug tracker [1] and on the kernel
one [2].
My main question is: does anyone else have the same issue?
This is because the person helping me at the Arch bug tracker is unable
to replicate it...
I am wondering what sort of weird combi
On 11/18/23 07:18, Giovanni Santini wrote:
...
Let's hope the problem gets solved soon. :)
Hi
You may have mentioned this already, but is there anything interesting
in the kernel logs?
I see no relevant looking ntfs3 commits in the kernel after 6.6.
There were some in 6.6 [1].
Since linux
Hi everyone,
On 2023-11-17 11:13, Łukasz Michalski wrote:
Looks like a bug. If something is written to file you should be able
to read it afterwards no matter if content is still in i/o buffer or
already written to disk.
This is definitely correct.
I just verified that `linux-lts` does not
Hi IacsaP,
On 2023-11-17 14:20, lacsaP Patatetom wrote:
(13:45) giovanni @ ~ $ echo "Using udisks and ntfs3" >
/run/media/giovanni/Data/mount_test.txt
(13:45) giovanni @ ~ $ cat /run/media/giovanni/Data/mount_test.txt
try calling `sysctl` after `sync` here :
(13:45) giovanni @ ~ $ sync; sudo sy
Le ven. 17 nov. 2023 à 13:49, Giovanni Santini
a écrit :
> Hi IacsaP and Lukasz,
> On 2023-11-17 08:40, lacsaP Patatetom wrote:
>
> on the `/proc/sys/vm/` side may be ?
> does the `sync` followed by a `sysctl -q vm.drop_caches=3` change things ?
>
> regards, lacsaP.
>
> tried but to no avail.
>
>
Hi IacsaP and Lukasz,
On 2023-11-17 08:40, lacsaP Patatetom wrote:
on the `/proc/sys/vm/` side may be ?
does the `sync` followed by a `sysctl -q vm.drop_caches=3` change things ?
regards, lacsaP.
tried but to no avail.
Here is the session output:
---
(13:44) giovanni @ ~ $ sysctl vm.drop_c
On 11/16/23 23:23, Giovanni Santini wrote:
Hi Marius,
On 2023-11-15 14:16, Marius Kittler wrote:
Since both are completely different implementations the syncing behavior might
differ. I haven't paid much attention to the syncing behavior of the new kernel
module but it might simply be more lazy
Le ven. 17 nov. 2023 à 07:41, Giovanni Santini
a écrit :
> Hi Marius,
> On 2023-11-15 14:16, Marius Kittler wrote:
>
> Since both are completely different implementations the syncing behavior might
> differ. I haven't paid much attention to the syncing behavior of the new
> kernel
> module but i
Hi Marius,
On 2023-11-15 14:16, Marius Kittler wrote:
Since both are completely different implementations the syncing behavior might
differ. I haven't paid much attention to the syncing behavior of the new kernel
module but it might simply be more lazy than the FUSE implementation. Does it
help t
Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2023, 12:59:27 CET schrieb Giovanni Santini:
> I am able to mount, browse the partition and create files; however, when
> writing content into a file, that does not happen.
>
> It seems the content is written only at partition unmount.
>
Since both are completely differ
Hi everyone,
I am currently having an issue with the new NTFS module.
I am able to mount, browse the partition and create files; however, when
writing content into a file, that does not happen.
It seems the content is written only at partition unmount.
I tried mounting my partition with both
11 matches
Mail list logo
