On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:48:59AM -0500, David C. Rankin via arch-general
wrote:
> As far as the rational "Arch used to pride itself in providing optimised
> binaries out of the box.", I can't see compilation to v3 being more than an
> immeasurable instruction or two different from a build for
On 9/5/22 04:39, Morten Linderud via arch-general wrote:
Please see the RFC which should have all the details.
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0002-march.rst
Thank you,
As long as it's a 2nd port -- that's fine, but I have a lot of v2 hardware,
i7 Sandy Brid
Please see the RFC which should have all the details.
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0002-march.rst
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
What does:
Future build infrastructure for Arch Linux
"We decided on supporting the x86_64-v3 microarchitecture"
Does that mean Arch will break on anything older than Haswell for Intel will
no longer be supported on Arch? Or am I missing something? SUSE going to ALP
is doing the v3 baseline f
