On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 22:50:21 +0100
Mike Cloaked via arch-general wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:13 PM David Rosenstrauch via arch-general <
> arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 6/7/21 3:49 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> > > I'll just live with it until I
On 6/7/21 6:48 AM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> ... Ok, so if it works then that means your output is happy now, right?
> Does it even *matter* if your output is happy, but you're retrieving 2
> things in parallel? Your objective here was to get uncorrupted output...
> *right*?
No,
No
On 2021-06-08 10:19, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
Blasphemy! When they pry my cold dead fingers off my konsole :)
Modern Konsole has tiling and all kinds of niceties, great wayland
support and just works :)
Maybe it's time to go with the times...
Cheers
On 6/7/21 4:50 PM, Mike Cloaked via arch-general wrote:
> It works fine in konsole
Well... this is KDE3 konsole :)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On 6/7/21 4:13 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> Or you could just switch to a modern terminal app! :-)
>
> DR
Blasphemy! When they pry my cold dead fingers off my konsole :)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On 06/07/21 at 02:49pm, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> On 6/7/21 4:46 AM, Xiretza via arch-general wrote:
> > From pacman.conf(5):
> >
> >> ParallelDownloads
> >> Specifies number of concurrent download streams. The value needs to be a
> >> positive integer. If this config option is not
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:13 PM David Rosenstrauch via arch-general <
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/21 3:49 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> > I'll just live with it until I have time to dig into the pacman source
> and
> > find out what this supposed "new feat
On 6/7/21 3:49 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I'll just live with it until I have time to dig into the pacman source and
find out what this supposed "new feature" is that screws up old terminals.
Or you could just switch to a modern terminal app! :-)
DR
On 2021-06-03 at 12:09:59 -0500,
"David C. Rankin via arch-general" wrote:
> On 6/3/21 4:17 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
> > The new progressbar requires specific escape codes (part of VT100 terminal
> > definition I think) to be supported.
> >
> > Atleast one terminal emulator (qtermin
On 6/7/21 4:46 AM, Xiretza via arch-general wrote:
> From pacman.conf(5):
>
>> ParallelDownloads
>> Specifies number of concurrent download streams. The value needs to be a
>> positive integer. If this config option is not set then only one download
>> stream is used (i.e. downloads happen sequent
On 6/7/21 5:43 AM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> On 6/7/21 3:56 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
>> Maybe you could test with a console terminal like getty / agetty instead of a
>> terminal emulator ?
>>
>>
>> Try setting ParallelDownloads = 0 in pacman.conf .
>>
>> LW
>
> Good t
On 07/06/2021 11.43, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/7/21 3:56 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
Maybe you could test with a console terminal like getty / agetty instead of a
terminal emulator ?
Try setting ParallelDownloads = 0 in pacman.conf .
LW
Good thought, but ...
er
On 6/7/21 3:56 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
> Maybe you could test with a console terminal like getty / agetty instead of a
> terminal emulator ?
>
>
> Try setting ParallelDownloads = 0 in pacman.conf .
>
> LW
ParallelDownloads = 1
works (and hopefully that means 1 at-a-time and not
On 6/7/21 3:56 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
> Maybe you could test with a console terminal like getty / agetty instead of a
> terminal emulator ?
>
>
> Try setting ParallelDownloads = 0 in pacman.conf .
>
> LW
Good thought, but ...
error: config file /etc/pacman.conf, line 38: value
On 07-06-2021 10:46, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/6/21 2:56 AM, Ralph Corderoy via arch-general wrote:
Hi David,
Why the informative text output from a package manager should use
anything other than basic terminal capabilities seems to fly in the
face of the Arch KISS philoso
On 6/6/21 2:56 AM, Ralph Corderoy via arch-general wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> Why the informative text output from a package manager should use
>> anything other than basic terminal capabilities seems to fly in the
>> face of the Arch KISS philosophy.
>
> As long as it's querying terminfo(5) to chec
Kr1ss via arch-general wrote:
> Hello David,
>
> >> ILoveCandy
> >Sounds like a slogan for a lollipop store rather than something that
> >should be part of a Linux package manager.
>
> It's an _easter egg_, not an official feature - but besides that, I
> don't actually believe it could have t
Hello David,
ILoveCandy
Sounds like a slogan for a lollipop store rather than something that
should be part of a Linux package manager.
It's an _easter egg_, not an official feature - but besides that, I
don't actually believe it could have the potential to fix your issue.
I'll try anythi
Hi David,
> Why the informative text output from a package manager should use
> anything other than basic terminal capabilities seems to fly in the
> face of the Arch KISS philosophy.
As long as it's querying terminfo(5) to check for the capability and
using the escape sequence presented there if
On 6/3/21 4:21 PM, Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> Does adding
>
> ILoveCandy
>
Sounds like a slogan for a lollipop store rather than something that should be
part of a Linux package manager. I'll try anything, but this seems like a
largely self-imposed wound. Why the informative text out
On 6/3/21 4:07 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> Actually, I think that might be the issue. (Or at least part of it.) I don't
> have these issues using xfce4-terminal.
g-darnit, now I have to patch that too! Use xterm and there was still a bit of
wonkiness like it was trying to do
Does adding
ILoveCandy
to /etc/pacman.conf make a difference?
I don't notice a progress bar issue. My setup:
$ grep IL /etc/pacman.conf
ILoveCandy
$ pacman -Qi roxterm | grep On
Depends On : dbus-glib vte3 hicolor-icon-theme
$ pacman -Q roxterm vte3
roxterm 3.11.1-1
vte3 0.64.1-1
On 6/3/21 4:59 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It rea
On 6/3/21 1:00 PM, David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
>> I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
>> terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
>> escape somewhe
On 2021-06-03 at 14:00:08 -0400,
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
> > I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
> > terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
> > e
On 6/3/21 1:09 PM, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
I did all 3 updates from different tabs in the same konsole (KDE), so the
terminal is VT100 compatible. It really looked like there was a bad ANSI
escape somewhere. It was night/day different than the last time I updated and
I've proba
On 6/3/21 4:17 AM, Lone_Wolf via arch-general wrote:
> The new progressbar requires specific escape codes (part of VT100 terminal
> definition I think) to be supported.
>
> Atleast one terminal emulator (qterminal ) has already been found not to
> support those , see https://bbs.archlinux.org/view
On 6/3/21 4:05 AM, Anton Hvornum via arch-general wrote:
> Just to make sure, you're not using archinstall when that "jumping around"
> happens right? Because if that's the case, then it's my fault and not
> pacman :)
>
Right, this is plain old 'pacman -Syu' on 3 boxes that have been running sinc
On 03-06-2021 10:37, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
F
Just to make sure, you're not using archinstall when that "jumping around"
happens right? Because if that's the case, then it's my fault and not
pacman :)
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 10:34 David C. Rankin via arch-general, <
arch-general@lists.archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhoug
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
>> My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
>
> pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
>
Follow up on my earlier report of jittery output on pacma
On 6/1/21 6:57 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough via arch-general wrote:
> On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
>> My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
>
> pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
>
and it has terminal output issues bigtime. Whatever is ca
On 01/06/2021 23:15, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
pacman=6.0.0-2 is already in stable. ;)
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 23:15 +, Yash Karandikar via arch-general wrote:
> My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
> Yash Karandikar
> d5c4 1cbc 071b 41b3 f235 da13 f01e 92cd 2390 f369
>
> Jun 1, 2021 6:12:53 PM u34--- via arch-general <
> arch-general@lists.archlinux.org
My guess is that they'll update that once pacman 6 hits stable.
Yash Karandikar
d5c4 1cbc 071b 41b3 f235 da13 f01e 92cd 2390 f369
Jun 1, 2021 6:12:53 PM u34--- via arch-general
:
> The time stamp at the bottom of
> https://archlinux.org/pacman/pacman.conf.5.html is Aug-2019. The way I
> understa
The time stamp at the bottom of
https://archlinux.org/pacman/pacman.conf.5.html is Aug-2019. The way I
understand pacman v6 conf, there are some changes. Such as retiring
TotalDownload. I haven't checked if there are differences with other files
at the site. Is updating pacman.conf.5.html alread
36 matches
Mail list logo
