On 12/20/21 3:51 AM, Bjoern Franke via arch-general wrote:
At least I'm getting xfs filesystem being remounted at
/run/systemd/unit-root/var/tmp supports timestamps until 2038
(0x7fff) also on 5.15.x
Kind Regards
Bjoern
That's a different message. That means that your filesystem is *
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 08:44:57 +
KSP Atlas via arch-general wrote:
> So it seems that you are using an old LTS kernel, try do "sudo pacman -S
> linux" and when asked remove linux-lts. If you aren't using LTS, try to
> update your mirrors.
>
> On 16 December 2021 00:43:06 GMT, pete via arch-gen
Am 20.12.21 um 09:44 schrieb KSP Atlas via arch-general:
So it seems that you are using an old LTS kernel, try do "sudo pacman -S linux"
and when asked remove linux-lts. If you aren't using LTS, try to update your mirrors.
At least I'm getting xfs filesystem being remounted at
/run/systemd/un
So it seems that you are using an old LTS kernel, try do "sudo pacman -S linux"
and when asked remove linux-lts. If you aren't using LTS, try to update your
mirrors.
On 16 December 2021 00:43:06 GMT, pete via arch-general
wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:10:40 -0500
>David Rosenstrauch via arch-
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 12:10:40 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> On 12/14/21 11:32 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
> > So why am i still seeing this then
> >
> > as i say i update the system virtually every day it makes no sense
>
> You are seeing this message in your dm
On 12/14/21 11:32 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
So why am i still seeing this then
as i say i update the system virtually every day it makes no sense
You are seeing this message in your dmesg / journalctl?
"EXPERIMENTAL big timestamp feature in use. Use at your own risk!"
Are you usi
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:32:55 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> On 12/14/21 8:27 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:00:28 -0500
> > David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
> > wrote:
> >> On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
> >>> I still gt t
On 12/14/21 8:27 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:00:28 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
I still gt the experimental warning every now and then have to try forced
update of all XFS related progs
You
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 15:00:28 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
> On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500
> > David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
> >>>
On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an
option to format with 64 bit timest
| On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
| > The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an
option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being flakey
somehow)
|
| The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for
| m
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500
David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
> > The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an
> > option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being
> > flak
On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote:
The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an option
to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being flakey somehow)
The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for
months w
| > /run/systemd/unit-root/var/tmp supports timestamps until 2038 (0x7fff)
| >
| > it is causing issues as far as i can make out on the USB Camera i get a
pile
| > of the above scroll up and the camera dies
| >
| > the camera is
| > Bus 002 Device 002: ID 23c5:1478 Xiongmai web camera it wo
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 23:41:49 +, pete via arch-general wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:36:55 +0100
>Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:04:44 +, Neven Sajko via arch-general
>> wrote:
>> >I'm pretty sure that a mount point named "tmp" should have tmpfs
>>
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:36:55 +0100
Ralf Mardorf via arch-general wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:04:44 +, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
> >I'm pretty sure that a mount point named "tmp" should have tmpfs
>
> Hi,
>
> not necessarily, see
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/tmpfs#Disab
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:04:44 +, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote:
>I'm pretty sure that a mount point named "tmp" should have tmpfs
Hi,
not necessarily, see
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/tmpfs#Disable_automatic_mount
Regards,
Ralf
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 10:59, pete via arch-general
wrote:
>
> Hi folks
>
> Most the time the system is spot ion thanks Arch Linux but every now and then
> i get something that is causing consternation one of those times is now i am
> getting this filling dmesg
>
> 23.113873] xfs filesystem
Hi folks
Most the time the system is spot ion thanks Arch Linux but every now and then
i get something that is causing consternation one of those times is now i am
getting this filling dmesg
23.113873] xfs filesystem being remounted at /run/systemd/unit-root/var/tmp
supports timestamps
19 matches
Mail list logo
