ists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-pub...@lists.archlinux.org/thread/EIKWRES2CMTO5D3GRIATVQ5YFUQMGQKZ/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/devtools/-/merge_requests/275
[3] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/nvchecker-poc
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
t; this makes much sense.
Just to make things clear, this isn't about automating the process of
flagging packages out of date on the AUR side but to provide a nvchecker
configuration to keep track of new upstream releases, primarily for the
maintainer(s) of the package.
[1] https://man.arc
On 11/2/24 11:00 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 11/1/24 1:23 PM, Robin Candau wrote:
You can't update a package without being a maintainer / co-maintainer
for it. However, since the package is currently orphaned, you can
become the maintainer for it and push the update.
Robin,
I ad
leaving the place for someone else to step up as
the maintainer if desired.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
#21b2f69c826d2665445f126d0888325fade01e6b_37_37
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
questioning (at
least for the time being, as no decision has been taken yet) which I
didn't felt was helpful regarding the current debate.
Thanks for expressing your thoughts (sincerely).
I just shared mine, nothing more :)
Take care,
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-pub...@lists.archlinux.org/message/Y7KUOXXVVMXEAVFUPK4I5GXB6J55CIF6/
[2]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-dev-pub...@lists.archlinux.org/message/5R6TXJRGFX4IXEZN2H6KAM2NMRU4DG2Z/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
could Arch Linux host it?"
Here again, I feel like this an important nuance to understand why the
discussion is specifically about rustypaste (and not about any other
similar services).
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/arch-general@lists.archlinux.org/message/KVDTLL3Z6YQQPPYRDL
rther ..
It looks like upstream repo is archived, so that might be it:
https://invent.kde.org/pim/knotes
You can still find it's packaging repository here if you want to build
it yourself:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/knotes
Thank you for an
dverse effects that might come from increasing the default?
I am also curious how the upstream discussed will go but I do not expect
them to change it.
Cheers,
Levitating
On 2024-03-25 09:10, Robin Candau wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm writing this mail as proposal to increase the default
`vm.ma
On 3/7/24 13:21, Ryan Petris wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 4:38 AM, Robin Candau wrote:
On 3/7/24 12:34, lacsaP Patatetom wrote:
> hi,
Hi,
>
> when I run `makepkg`, it generates a second package with the `-debug`
> "extension" (eg. `mypackage-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst`
On 3/7/24 12:41, Robin Candau wrote:
On 3/7/24 12:38, Georg wrote:
hi,
when I run `makepkg`, it generates a second package with the `-debug`
"extension" (eg. `mypackage-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst` and
`mypackage-debug-w.x.y-z-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst`).
I couldn't find anything ab
symbols for
analyses and debugging purposes.
See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Debuginfod for more info.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
: is this a new feature
and/or is there a parameter to pass to `makepkg` to avoid building it ?
Debug packages have been introduced in Arch in early 2022.
See https://archlinux.org/news/debug-packages-and-debuginfod/
regards, lacsaP.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC30
sting_repositories
[2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_Testing_Team
[3]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Bug_reporting_guidelines
[4]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_Testing_Team#Guidelines
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Ope
p would be greatfully received
Thanks Pete .
[1]
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/mkinitcpio/mkinitcpio/-/issues/238
[2]
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/mkinitcpio/mkinitcpio/-/merge_requests/292
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP
[1] since 2017 [2] ;)
I use it myself without any issue.
[1] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/kea/
[2]
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/kea/-/commit/98906efc31200318a1e311c035e800a270d8f885
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Le 09/12/2023 à 12:54, Robin Candau a écrit :
Le 09/12/2023 à 09:14, Jude DaShiell a écrit :
Correction, both ddgr and ddgr-git throw error 202 when run. What is
error code 202? I've never encountered that error code in connection
with
html yet.
The issue has been reported upstre
ed on DuckDuckgo's side, provoking that
issue. Upstream is considering archiving ddgr's repo if this persists [2].
If that happens, I will drop the package from Arch repositories.
[1] https://github.com/jarun/ddgr/issues/158
[2] https://github.com/jarun/ddgr/issues/158#issuecomment-1848207495
--
ng list.
Now let's all be civil and drop it/focus on the initial subject of this
thread please :)
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;top posting" means.
And yet you're still doing it :)
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Mailing_lists
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/General_guidelines#Top_posting
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP
rs
- https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/#no-trolling
-
https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/#controversycontroversial-topics
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenP
l Firefox issue initially
stated please.
[1]
https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/?rdfrom=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.archlinux.org%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DCode_of_conduct%26redirect%3Dno#controversycontroversial-topics
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Descr
in our bugtracker [1].
Can you open a ticket there (with all the possible details) please?
Thanks in advance :)
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nswer.
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ragmatism
[2] https://archlinux.org/packages/
[3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Getting_involved
[4] https://whatcanidofor.archlinux.org/
[5] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_IRC_channels
--
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
OpenPGP_0xFDC3040B92ACA748.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
de
in my opinion.
Regards,
Robin Candau / Antiz
27 matches
Mail list logo