Re: /usr/bin/tqdm in filesystem NOT owned by any package? (python tqdm)

2024-08-11 Thread Brian Thompson
I understand that programmers aren't what they used to be., but never thought about Python package management that way. Our profession has been reduced to "coding" and whored out over the latest decade. "Anyone can code" is one of the most ridiculous statements so far this millenia. Nonetheless, co

Re: /usr/bin/tqdm in filesystem NOT owned by any package? (python tqdm)

2024-08-11 Thread Patricio Martínez
David, I understand you perfectly. Now, programmers don't program. They make programs that combine different blocks of code from other people. This makes the programming easier but harder to maintain, and too much insecure. You know the Python world, but the Javascript/Typescript world is wor

Re: /usr/bin/tqdm in filesystem NOT owned by any package? (python tqdm)

2024-08-11 Thread David C. Rankin
On 8/11/24 2:45 PM, Maxxcan Fox wrote: I don't like python too much, but in this case Edward Toroshchyn is right. Normally I only install python packages with pacman when they are dependencies of antoher program. When it's a isolate Python applications I use the wonderful virtual enviorement of

Re: /usr/bin/tqdm in filesystem NOT owned by any package? (python tqdm)

2024-08-11 Thread Maxxcan Fox
El Sun, 11 Aug 2024 07:28:08 + Edward Toroshchyn escribió: > All, > > I would like to defend Python a little bit here. > > On Sunday, August 11th, 2024 at 02:48, David C. Rankin > wrote: > > I hate that insecure python software supply-chain. > > In my opinion, it is the responsibility of

Re: /usr/bin/tqdm in filesystem NOT owned by any package? (python tqdm)

2024-08-11 Thread Edward Toroshchyn
All, I would like to defend Python a little bit here. On Sunday, August 11th, 2024 at 02:48, David C. Rankin wrote: > I hate that insecure python software supply-chain. In my opinion, it is the responsibility of the system administrator to avoid installing software other than by using the pack