Re: [arch-announce] The xz package has been backdoored

2024-03-31 Thread David C. Rankin
On 3/30/24 12:34, Genes Lists wrote: On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 18:55 +, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: David Runge wrote: TL;DR: Upgrade your systems and container images **now**! Question: Would it make sense, therefore, to switch builds, where possible, away from tar files a

Re: Which Emacs package?

2024-03-31 Thread Abraham S.A.H.
> GNUStep is a great example: I agree with you - it was w-a-a-a-y before its > time.  Still, I wasn't willing to go down that path alone.  I worked on > XEmacs for a long time, but eventually, I gave up - it just got too hard and > too lonely. The same here.  However, note that `emacs-lucid` pa

Re: Which Emacs package?

2024-03-31 Thread Vin Shelton
GNUStep is a great example: I agree with you - it was w-a-a-a-y before its time. Still, I wasn't willing to go down that path alone. I worked on XEmacs for a long time, but eventually, I gave up - it just got too hard and too lonely. What I am saying is, I guess, it's all a personal choice. -

Re: Which Emacs package?

2024-03-31 Thread Abraham S.A.H.
> I'm not exactly what you're looking for, from Emacs or from the mailing > list. >From Emacs, to have as many functionalities working as possible with the least >trade-offs and the least bugs and issues as possible. >From mailing list, to tell me what Emacs they use and if they have some >spec