Re: Which Emacs package?

Ey, If you've already tried all of them, I don't know what to say. The Arch-maintained repo sounds like the stablest, and "emacs-wayland - with native compilation and PGTK enabled." sounds very appealing to me. -- Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key

Re: Which Emacs package?

> >From Extra repository: > * emacs > * emacs-wayland I used emacs-wayland for a while instead of emacs, because I already use a Wayland compositor, but after some months I switched back because: * opening context menus, and going back to a buffer, * selecting text on a buffer while scrolling. S

Re: Which Emacs package?

On 2024-03-30 at 19:26:32 +0100, "Abraham S.A.H." wrote: > There are many Emacs packages available across Arch repositories and AUR. > > I list some of them here, in no specific order: > > >From Extra repository: > * emacs > * emacs-wayland > * emacs-nativecomp > * emacs-nox > > >From AUR and

Which Emacs package?

Hey fellows; There are many Emacs packages available across Arch repositories and AUR. I list some of them here, in no specific order: >From Extra repository: * emacs * emacs-wayland * emacs-nativecomp * emacs-nox >From AUR and some third party repositories: * emacs-lucid-nativecomp * emacs-gi

Re: man.archlinux.org/man/xzmore.1.uk is not in English

I'm pretty sure most man pages don't have a special version for a different English dialect anyway. Also, have you any idea what OP means about the hash mismatch? -- Cheers, Aᴀʀᴏɴ OpenPGP_0x4E85967FC7C436BE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi