On 3/24/24 15:13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi David,
don't rename the file unless you want to recreate it every time you
upgrade. If you really want to stick with dbus-broker and these messages
bother you, then consider use /etc/pacman.conf .
NoExtract = usr/share/dbus1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thu
On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 21:13 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> don't rename the file unless you want to recreate it every time you
> upgrade.
^ tumbler ;D
On Sun, 2024-03-24 at 14:43 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> or whatever creates the dbus rule
$ pacman -Qo /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thumbnailer1.service
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thumbnailer1.service is owned by
tumbler 4.18.2-1
Hi David,
don't rename the file unless you want to recreate it every time you
upgrade. If you really want to stick with dbus-broker and these messages
bother you, then consider use /etc/pacman.conf .
NoExtract = usr/share/dbus1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thumbnailer1.service
My 2 cents,
Ralf
On 3/24/24 09:55, Merell L. Matlock, Jr. wrote:
Shouldn't be any problem; dunst had the same type of notices in the
journal. My solution was to rename the dunst service file.
In your case, rename the service files listed, adding <.disabled> to the
end of those filenames. Reboot, and those errors
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 02:23:57AM GMT, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Are we supposed to do anything to fix these dbus-broker-launch journal
> warnings?
>
> Mar 24 02:15:31 valkyrie dbus-broker-launch[1130]: Service file
> '/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thumbnailer1.service' is not
> na
Are we supposed to do anything to fix these dbus-broker-launch journal
warnings?
Mar 24 02:15:31 valkyrie dbus-broker-launch[1130]: Service file
'/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.xfce.Tumbler.Thumbnailer1.service' is not
named after the D-Bus name 'org.freedesktop.thumbnails.Thumbnailer1'.
Mar
On 3/19/24 20:30, Aaron Liu wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=png2ico
Protip: Even if a deletion request passes, the git repository is *never*
deleted. All that happens to it is that it gets delisted and effectively
orphaned.
Very weird situation. There were no de
