Re: vbox dkms fix - How to include fix for linux, but not linux-lts?

2023-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
On 8/26/23 02:01, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Note, I only run linux (with ro threadirqs ibt=off). JIC I installed linux-lts, linux-rt, too. However, building the modules by using the 019-linux-6-4-10.patch obviously works for those kernels, too. Thank you Ralf! Packages (2) virtualbox-bin-6.1.46-3

Re: vbox dkms fix - How to include fix for linux, but not linux-lts?

2023-08-26 Thread David C. Rankin
On 8/26/23 02:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 09:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 22:50 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:    How best to do this? Seemingly it's done by the "if", resp. "if not" ;). "if RTLNX_VER_MIN(6,4,10)" Brilliant! The 6.4.10 patch for

Re: Unicode issues after system upgrade

2023-08-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 21:09 +0200, Jeanette C. wrote: > Hey hey, > I just upgraded my system and upon restart, now running kernel 6.4.11-arch2-1 > #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC and everything else that was available one/two days > ago. > [snip] I can't really tell, whether the improper display of charac

Unicode issues after system upgrade

2023-08-26 Thread Jeanette C.
Hey hey, I just upgraded my system and upon restart, now running kernel 6.4.11-arch2-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC and everything else that was available one/two days ago. When I rebooted my computer today, I ran into UTF-8 issues. I use a braille display, running brltty, which apparnelty has also

Re: vbox dkms fix - How to include fix for linux, but not linux-lts?

2023-08-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 09:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 22:50 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > > > >    How best to do this? Seemingly it's done by the "if", resp. "if not" ;). "if RTLNX_VER_MIN(6,4,10)"

Re: vbox dkms fix - How to include fix for linux, but not linux-lts?

2023-08-26 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2023-08-25 at 22:50 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >    The problem is that LTS doesn't like the additional include. I suspect it > will take some makefile patch instead of a change of the source file so LTS > can build without the new header. > >    How best to do this? PS: Note, I onl