On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 10:37 +, u...@net9.ga wrote:
> I did nothing to make it use tmpfs. Should I explicitly take some actions
> to get it outside of tmpfs?
Hi,
no you don't need to take any action.
I suspect my other idea to disable tmpfs entirely is entirely idiotic.
$ df -h | grep tmpfs
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's much likely that you cannot build a kernel in tmpfs.
> By default your 4G RAM are 2G tmpfs. However, if you configure to build
> a slim kernel, it might work, let alone that you should get an "out of
> space" error, if you run out of space. Swapping by providin
Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > I saw the LD proccess consumed almost all of the machine free
> > memory. And also a lot of swap. Which happend right at the LD operation,
> > not before. It is only a desktop, Only 4G RAM.
>
> I'm surprised you could've ever compiled a kernel with only 4GB Ram
>
>
On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 11:07 +0200, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> I'm surprised you could've ever compiled a kernel with only 4GB Ram
>
> People are talking here about optimisations so it can compile on 32GB
> machines:
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.3-objtool
In this case, while my first
Jaron Kent-Dobias wrote:
> On Monday, 3 April 2023 at 08:58 (+), u...@net9.ga wrote:
> >I haven't tried all the 6.2.*. Only some of the earliest, and some of
> >the latest. v6.2.9, at this time. I could build the earliest v6.1.*.
> >And also v6.1.12. Which is arch latest v6.1.*, doesn't it?
Hi,
it's much likely that you cannot build a kernel in tmpfs.
By default your 4G RAM are 2G tmpfs. However, if you configure to build
a slim kernel, it might work, let alone that you should get an "out of
space" error, if you run out of space. Swapping by providing way enough
swap space never work
> I saw the LD proccess consumed almost all of the machine free
> memory. And also a lot of swap. Which happend right at the LD operation,
> not before. It is only a desktop, Only 4G RAM.
I'm surprised you could've ever compiled a kernel with only 4GB Ram
People are talking here about optimisatio
On Monday, 3 April 2023 at 08:58 (+), u...@net9.ga wrote:
I haven't tried all the 6.2.*. Only some of the earliest, and some of
the latest. v6.2.9, at this time. I could build the earliest v6.1.*.
And also v6.1.12. Which is arch latest v6.1.*, doesn't it? I got what
looks to me a similar is
Hello,
I haven't tried all the 6.2.*. Only some of the earliest, and some of the
latest. v6.2.9, at this time. I could build the earliest v6.1.*. And also
v6.1.12. Which is arch latest v6.1.*, doesn't it? I got what looks to me
a similar issue with v6.1.7, if I remember correctly.
As of v6.2.7 a
