Re: bio_check_ro @ blk-core.c

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
Le mar. 21 mars 2023 à 11:27, Emil Velikov a écrit : > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 16:49, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > back again ;-) > > > > this github page will perhaps allow you to better understand my problem and > > to guide me towards a solution. > > > > my main problem is my

Re: bio_check_ro @ blk-core.c

2023-03-21 Thread Emil Velikov
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 16:49, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi, > > back again ;-) > > this github page will perhaps allow you to better understand my problem and > to guide me towards a solution. > > my main problem is my inability to patch the kernel as I used to do in order > to prevent LVM to

Re: linux headers

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
again thank you for explanations/clarifications. have a good day, regards, lacsaP. Le mar. 21 mars 2023 à 11:16, Genes Lists a écrit : > On 3/21/23 04:26, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: > > hi everybody, > > > > > my development workstation is running 6.1.20-1-lts and I made > > linux-lts-ro-6.1.15-1-

Re: linux headers

2023-03-21 Thread Genes Lists
On 3/21/23 04:26, lacsaP Patatetom wrote: hi everybody, my development workstation is running 6.1.20-1-lts and I made linux-lts-ro-6.1.15-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst and linux-lts-ro-headers-6.1.15-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst packages on it : if now I want to compile on this development workstation appl

Re: linux headers

2023-03-21 Thread lacsaP Patatetom
hi everybody, if point #1 is now relatively clear to me (eg. out of tree kernel modules need to recompile, otherwise it should work with few exceptions), point #2 is still pending. so I rephrase my question hoping to find an answer ;-) my development workstation is running 6.1.20-1-lts and I mad