On 2/8/23 15:20, a...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Can't you just install the required version of glibc [1] to build the
drivers, or does that lead to other incompatibilities
A working solution has been found and posted to both:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2083698
and
https://a
On 2/8/23 15:20, a...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Can't you just install the required version of glibc [1] to build the
drivers, or does that lead to other incompatibilities
[1] As discussed e.g at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/847179/multiple-glibc-libraries-on-a-single-host
Damn good idea.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:52:47 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Things look very grim for the 110 Nvidia cards that use the
> nvidia-390xx driver. Seems the binary pieces built and supplied by
> nvidia and those that you build must be built using the same glibc.
> The last update by Nvidia for the 3
On 2/7/23 21:55, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 2/7/23 10:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
It appears I'm not the only one. Soon after posting to the AUR project
for the nvidia-390xx drivers, another confirmed x broke for him as well. See
latest comments at:
https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/
On 2/7/23 19:29, David C. Rankin wrote:
graphics, and startx/fluxbox works fine there. Thinking it may be the
AUR drivers, I rebuilt the nvidia drivers as well, e.g.
David
Instead of recompiling them, did you try not using them, just try with
nouveau instead - there's a non-zero probabity t
On 2/8/23 04:26, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 2/7/23 19:20, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
...
There is some distinct permission or auth change in the package
updates from the last 3-4 days that is preventing an xorg connection
resulting in "Connection Refused". I captured the full startx output
in
