Re: [arch-general] User-Submitted Package Updates (how it could possibly work)

2022-01-17 Thread George Rawlinson via arch-general
On 22-01-17 15:07, Vasi Vilvoiu via arch-general wrote: > What is the planned timeline for this migration? IMHO it would do a great > deal of good to the community to (a) communicate these plans clearly and (b) > communicate where help is needed and how the community can pitch in. I'm going to be

Re: [arch-general] User-Submitted Package Updates (how it could possibly work)

2022-01-17 Thread Vasi Vilvoiu via arch-general
Hi Caleb! On 1/17/22 10:22, Caleb Maclennan via arch-general wrote: I think it will be better to finish the migration from SVN → Git for all the repository files and tooling. Once PKGBUILDs are in Git and hosted on Arch's GitLab installation and the tooling is updated so that build and release

Re: [arch-general] User-Submitted Package Updates (how it could possibly work)

2022-01-17 Thread Caleb Maclennan via arch-general
On 2022-01-17 01:24, Philip Evens via arch-general wrote: tl;dr: Users submit PKGBUILD diffs, anyone with commit access builds and pushes them. What do you think? I agree something along these lines can and should be done, but I also think there are a few pitfalls with the scheme you outlined.