Re: [arch-general] Python 3.10: LooseVersion, distutils slated for removal at 3.12

2021-12-13 Thread u34--- via arch-general
Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote: > Python 3.10 is now in the stable repos! > > (Some issues are to be expected but hopefully nothing too bad.) I assume you are aware to. For the record: /usr/bin/unoconv:19: DeprecationWarning: The distutils package is deprecated and slat

Re: [arch-general] Strange and annoying causing issues

2021-12-13 Thread David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
On 12/13/21 2:30 PM, pete via arch-general wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500 David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote: On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote: The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an option to format with 64 bit timest

Re: [arch-general] Strange and annoying causing issues

2021-12-13 Thread brettm via arch-general
| On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote: | > The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being flakey somehow) | | The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for | m

Re: [arch-general] Strange and annoying causing issues

2021-12-13 Thread pete via arch-general
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:16:50 -0500 David Rosenstrauch via arch-general wrote: > > > On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote: > > The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an > > option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being > > flak

Re: [arch-general] Strange and annoying causing issues

2021-12-13 Thread David Rosenstrauch via arch-general
On 12/13/21 12:27 AM, brettm via arch-general wrote: The part about the timestamps is a normal warning with XFS (there is an option to format with 64 bit timestamps but I seem to recall it being flakey somehow) The XFS bigtime features isn't at all flakey. (I've been using it for months w