On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 17:46 -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general
wrote:
> Em novembro 13, 2021 18:56 Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho via arch-
> general escreveu:
> > Hi
> >
> > Why is Arch Linux core repository still using glibc version 2.33?
> > Why
> > not upgrade the core repository t
On 11/16/21 6:12 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 05:05, Paul M. Foster wrote:
On 11/15/21 9:18 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
Well, I created this USB stick with dd. I used the basic ISO available
on the Arch download mirrors. I'm assuming from what you say that a
stick bui
https://mobile.twitter.com/Snowden/status/1460666075033575425
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 02:53:08 -0600, David C. Rankin via arch-general
wrote:
>> 5. What is the optimal upgrade path of it? (LTS -> LTS, when new LTS
>> is released? Stay on 103 until it's EOL? …?)
>
>The packages are interchangeable. At the end of the 5 year support
>period, the user can simply tr
On 11/17/21 1:43 AM, Fabian Bornschein via arch-general wrote:
> I think this comes down to a few questions:
>
> 1. What are the benefits of it?
5 years stable update to the 103 LTS branch. I will get 3 more years of update
than the new 104 release
> 2. Who's going to package,test,maintain it?
