I think this comes down to a few questions:
1. What are the benefits of it?
2. Who's going to package,test,maintain it?
3. Who's going to use it?
4. Will this potentially require to keep older versions of dependencies
in the repos at some point?
5. What is the optimal upgrade path of it? (LTS ->
All,
Just curious why Arch doesn't also provide the option to track clamav_LTS
which will stay with 103 and will be supported much longer than 104?
I know, I know, Arch matches upstream, but when upstream provides both
current and LTS, wouldn't it make sense to also package and provide LTS li
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 05:05, Paul M. Foster wrote:
>
> On 11/15/21 9:18 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> >> Well, I created this USB stick with dd. I used the basic ISO available
> >> on the Arch download mirrors. I'm assuming from what you say that a
> >> stick built from dd wouldn't satisfy what
You can also try this iso:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Archboot
It supports all UEFI modes.
greetings
tpowa
Am Di., 16. Nov. 2021 um 09:29 Uhr schrieb Fabian Bornschein via
arch-general :
> Hi. You're sure that EFI support is available on that board? Some of
> the first "EFI-enabled" boards
Hi. You're sure that EFI support is available on that board? Some of
the first "EFI-enabled" boards where only able to "efiboot" via CD/DVD,
not over USB.
Am Mo, 15. Nov 2021 um 23:05:40 -0500 schrieb Paul M. Foster via
arch-general :
I can't find a setting for this in the BIOS. There is no me
