Am Donnerstag, dem 11.03.2021 um 08:09 +0100 schrieb Reto:
> It's not the same context...
>
> A "fork" is an eating utensil that you use to shove food into your
> mouth.
> However, a "fork" is also a software project that is based of some
> prior work.
> It's also a point where a road diverges int
El jueves, 11 de marzo de 2021 3:42:39 (CET), Simon Perry via arch-general
escribió:
Hi gang,
I was wondering what the best avenue would be to request an
update to a community package which no longer has a maintainer?
The one you used.
The package in question is:
https://archlinux.org/pack
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:43:30AM +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder via arch-general
wrote:
> in the arch world I see two different definition of an "orphan".
>[...]
> This is confusing. Would it make sense to change the wording so that it
> is not ambiguous anymore.
It's not the same context...
A "f
Hi,
in the arch world I see two different definition of an "orphan".
The pacman manpage says:
orphans - packages that were installed as dependencies
but are no longer required by any installed package.
For the AUR the definition of an "orphan" is
If all maintainers of a
Hi gang,
I was wondering what the best avenue would be to request an update to a
community package which no longer has a maintainer?
The package in question is:
https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/libsidplayfp/
Cheers.
--
Simon Perry
