Hi,
On 26. 01. 21 20:20, Evangelos Foutras via arch-dev-public wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 10:05, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
Building Chromium without API keys results in a browser that is
unsuitable for production use. Removing the OAuth 2.0 credentials (or
when the Chrome team limits them)
>
> From: Morten Linderud
> Sent: Wed Jan 27 00:24:13 CET 2021
> To: Geo Kozey
> Cc: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Chromium losing Sync support on
> March 15
>
> Regardless of what is pessimistic spe
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:05:21AM +0100, Geo Kozey wrote:
> This is mostly pessimistic speculation. There are still 6 weeks ahead
> before anything changes at all. After that it's still possible that
> only the sync will be lost. IMO dropping package should be the last
> option used only when no o
>
> From: Morten Linderud via arch-general
> Sent: Tue Jan 26 22:46:52 CET 2021
> To:
> Cc: Morten Linderud
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Chromium losing Sync support on
> March 15
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:31:37PM +0100, Geo K
Em janeiro 26, 2021 18:46 Morten Linderud via arch-general escreveu:
The non-oauth api key will continue to work for now. This includes safe browsing.
And geolocation. But, it looks like logging in into chromium, plus a bunch of
other
stuff will stop working when we remove the oauth keys.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:31:37PM +0100, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote:
> > From: Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public
> >
> > On 1/26/21 9:53 PM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote:
> > >
> > > It's dissapointing frankly.
> > >
> >
> > Disappointing doesn't really catch it tho. If it
>
> From: Levente Polyak via arch-dev-public
> Sent: Tue Jan 26 22:18:21 CET 2021
> To:
> Cc: Levente Polyak
> Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Chromium losing Sync support on March 15
>
>
> On 1/26/21 9:53 PM, Morten Linderud via arch-dev-public wrote
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, 24 January 2021 г., 17:20, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general
wrote:
> According to Wiki you can test it and switch to it if you think it's
> working - then remove mkinitcpio. So if one want to make sure dracut is
> working how does {s}he test it?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:49:52PM +0100, Marcel Menzel via arch-general wrote:
> Following up: Commenting out "CheckSpace" in pacman.conf will lead to
> the desired behavior. Is this considered worth reporting as a bug in the
> bugtracker?
Please report it as a bug :)
--
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C
Archdevs,
Just as postfix is being split to separate non-default backends into
separate packages, can pam_systemd_home.so functionality be split out into a
separate package. The problems caused by this disabled part of pambase is
discussed here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=19520
10 matches
Mail list logo
