Re: [arch-general] IPv6 Support

2009-09-09 Thread slubman
So for all of you who don't know about IPv6. You can handle a lot of IPv6 addresses at one interface. Can someone help, please? Thanks a lot! King regards, Sash aka hardcore -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] IPv6 Support

2009-09-09 Thread slubman
On 9 sept. 2009, at 23:09, Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:53 PM, slubman wrote: I'm using IPv6 on my arch boxes, and yes you can use v4 nd v6 at the same time, and also use multiple v6 addresses on the same ethernet card. Here is what I have in my rc.conf : eth0=

Re: [arch-general] Why qemu/kqemu conflict to kvm ?

2009-10-29 Thread slubman
he "kvm" package just has a newer > version of the KVM code than the qemu package. There is also another argument to use the 2 packages. Only the qemu package provide other archs than x86 and x86_64. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

[arch-general] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-23 Thread slubman
_64. Does someone know where is it coming from ? And How can I get rid off this message ? -- slubman site : http://www.slubman.info/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-23 Thread slubman
On Saturday 24 April 2010 07:10:46 Gary Wright wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:27 PM, slubman wrote: > > Since the openssl update, whenever I install or update a package with > > pacman, I've got this message as the last pacman output line when a > > package is inst

[arch-general] (quite solved)Re: /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-24 Thread slubman
Le Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:25:28 +0200, Thomas Jost a écrit : > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:27:24 +0200, slubman > wrote: > > Since the openssl update, whenever I install or update a package > > with pacman, I've got this message as the last pacman output line > > when

Re: [arch-general] Just thinking out loud...

2012-01-08 Thread slubman
On Sunday 08 January 2012 19:00:44 Axilleas P wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Clive Cooper wrote: > > ... I wonder how much work would be involved in compiling ArchLinux to > > run on a Raspberry PI? > > > > Clive > > -- > > Infinity: A concept for those who cannot comprehend the big pic

Re: [arch-general] Do packages built on libusb need rebuilding on libusbx? upsd won't stay connected over usb.

2012-06-09 Thread slubman
e latest upgrade I did (kernel, libusbx, systems-tools and a lot of other stuffs), upsd wouldn’t connect. But as described on the AUR page, the package must be recompiled, with an addition to the configure command to put the udev rules in the correct directory. Cf. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5379 Best regards. -- Nicolas D (a.k.a slubman)

Re: [arch-general] Do packages built on libusb need rebuilding on libusbx? upsd won't stay connected over usb.

2012-06-10 Thread slubman
you can issue this command: udevadm trigger Then check for the device permissions. -- Nicolas D (aka slubman)

Re: [arch-general] When will Arch switch to Upstart

2011-01-19 Thread slubman
>> Any ideas when will Arch switch to upstart based booting system ? >> >> http://upstart.ubuntu.com/ >> >> Thanks, >> Madhur >> -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] IPv6 causing wget/curl to hang for a long time?

2011-06-06 Thread slubman
On 06/06/2011 10:54, KESHAV P.R. wrote: For now use wget --inet4-only# or curl --ipv4 to ensure both use only ipv4 addresses. Or shorter: wget -4 curl -4 -- slubman

Re: [arch-general] Mailing list rename

2007-11-29 Thread slubman
Le Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:17:49 +0100, Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > How does it break GPG/MIME? Just curious. > GPG/MIME encrypts/signs the WHOLE email. Subject, body and > attachments and attaches this to an new email. > Mail programm notices

Re: [arch-general] Architecture neutral packages

2007-12-02 Thread slubman
ssed (for example there : http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-September/001829.html ) -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] makepkg running as root

2008-01-22 Thread slubman
recursively on '/' > > Although i must admit that i didn't check arch's manpage yet. > > In the arch manpage, I can see: --preserve-root do not remove `/' (default) > mvg, > Guus -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] Xorg fails to start: no screens found

2008-05-16 Thread slubman
ce0" Driver "vesa" EndSection You should have a working X server after that. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] Kernel upgrades question, as can't revert to earlier kernel

2008-05-28 Thread slubman
e? When upgrading a kernel on my Arch box, I simply cp the old kernel and associated initrd, so that I can Boot on it. But, it's also easy to boot on a live-cd and install the old package as long as it's still in you /var/cache/pacman/pkg -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] Anyway to revert back to KDE 3.5.9? (Don't Panic)

2008-08-13 Thread slubman
konsole is thre. I lost my panels organisation, but, indeed, it(s not so much a nightmare like everyone in this thread seems to think. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] vnc on display:0

2008-12-30 Thread slubman
polls, I am not sure if I > can achieve any decent speed boost. > > Thank you > Sagar N > -- slubman site : http://www.slubman.info/ -- slubman site : http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] xorg-server 1.6.0 in testing

2009-03-03 Thread slubman
e the first version of X, it's similar to the > three-finger-salute windows users are used to. It's not that someone > would press CTRL+ALT+BS by accident or something. > Just wondering : switching to a TTY (using CTRL+ALT+F{1..6}) and killing the X server from there doesn't work anymore ? -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

[arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one available on the project site. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/# $Id: PKGBUILD 356 2008-04-18 22:56:27Z aaron $ # Maintainer: tobias

Re: [arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 17:40:47 Allan McRae wrote: > slubman wrote: > > As stated in the thread on outdated PKGBUILD, this is an email with an > > updated PKGBUILD for gmpc which is 2 releases behind the current one > > available on the project site. > > For any dev lo

Re: [arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
ball) Correct one attached here. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/ # $Id: PKGBUILD 356 2008-04-18 22:56:27Z aaron $ # Maintainer: tobias # Contributor: Nicolas Doualot pkgname=libmpd pkgver=0.18.0 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="Signal based wrapper around libmpdclient" arch=(i686 x86_6

Re: [arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:57:03 slubman wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009 18:48:55 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > from your pkguild: > > > > mv index.php* ./${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz > > tar xzf ${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz > > > > why this?! >

Re: [arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:06:12 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > 2009/4/7 slubman : > > Reply to self, still some issues in the previous one > > I changed > make DESTDIR=$startdir/pkg install > to > make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install > and pushed libmpd 0.18.0 > > why

Re: [arch-general] Updated PKGBUILD for gmpc

2009-04-07 Thread slubman
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 19:13:46 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > 2009/4/7 slubman : > > Because of: > > > > ldd $(which gmpc) | grep sexy > >libsexy.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsexy.so.2 (0x7fc9f1977000) > > Do you know what are the vantages of use libsexy? >

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread slubman
ot;Hello" > foo/test1 $ cat foo/test1 Hello But doesn't seem to be the case for my home directory... Hopefully, it's my laptop, not a shared computer. -- slubman site: http://www.slubman.info/

Re: [arch-general] Understanding permissions

2009-04-16 Thread slubman
On 16 avr. 09, at 22:47, slubman wrote: On 16 avr. 09, at 22:21, ludovic coues wrote: I'm pretty sure that +x is not set for everybody in home. Just cause you don't want that anybody can see what folder you have. If you want have have a pokemon subfolder of anime, nobody else n