On 19/11/14 16:54, Rasmus Liland wrote:
This is interesting. Do you mean synchronizing via NTP protocol?
My experience from this laptop is that the RTC quickly becomes desynchronized
at times when I am not able to sync via OpenNTPd, i.e. when I am not
connected to the internet.
If so, don't
On 20/11/14 20:24, Rasmus Liland wrote:
[snip]
I checked dmesg now after having uptime of ...
[snip]
... about 26 hours. It seems after about 19 hours some (possibly) temperature
related were causing mce hardware errors over a ten minute interval:
[snip]
As the system did not reboot, it were
On 11/12/14 13:44, Sadika Sumanapala wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone using KeePass missing/not showing fonts? There are missing
fonts in some dialog boxes (file open dialog, font dialog :)
The latest gsfonts package contains fonts with different names to the
ones used previously for almost 15 years.
On 17/12/14 09:32, Ido Rosen wrote:
Agreed that everything in "core" should be maximally stable. (Also,
following upstream stable releases rather than unstable releases fits
just fine with Arch's philosophy of following upstream releases, since
unstable releases are really just poorly named re
On 17/12/14 11:28, Ido Rosen wrote:
We seem to be in agreement: 2.1.x is not yet in the set of upstream
*stable* releases, but 2.0.x is in that set.
Not really. You missed the "as close to current".
Therefore, Arch should follow 2.0.x until upstream has marked 2.1.x as
stable. Someone made
On 17/12/14 13:04, Ido Rosen wrote:
Did you read the rest of that paragraph? You disregarded my points as
a red herring, then made a straw man argument that we should donate
instead of downgrading (and leave Arch users vulnerable). In the same
paragraph, you quote Arch policy which agrees with
On 17/12/14 09:22, Christian Demsar wrote:
I had internet connection when installing from an iso I built using the
archiso tools, but dhcpcd isn't connecting any more (starting via
sytemd). I've also had internet access in previous installs of archlinux
and FreeBSD, so I don't think there's anyt
On 17/12/14 16:46, Jacob Joseph wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:43:52 +1100
Gaetan Bisson wrote:
[2014-12-17 09:03:31 -0500] Ido Rosen:
2.0.26 is the stable version suggested for most users,
2.1.1 is the brand-new modern version
Arch is not stable, it's modern.
Besides, there are no open bug
On 19/12/14 17:13, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in a little bit of a pickle, and I would like to ask for some help
with my particular setup.
I haven't switched to `systemd` and I'm still booting my system with
the old `initscripts` `/etc/rc.sysinit` and friends (except this all
Hmm... If the other message wen through, my apologies, it is completely
wrong.
On 19/12/14 17:13, Ciprian Dorin Craciun wrote:
Hello all!
I'm in a little bit of a pickle, and I would like to ask for some help
with my particular setup.
I haven't switched to `systemd` and I'm still booting my s
On 22/12/14 11:09, Sadika Sumanapala wrote:
A.) Installing fontconfig-git from the AUR.
B.) Install ttf-ms-fonts as already mentioned in this thread.
C.) Do both. And while at it install ttf-carlito and ttf-caladea to
replace Calibri and Cambria in all those Office 2007/2010/2013 documents
out
On 24/12/14 09:15, Sadika Sumanapala wrote:
> Ahh. Yes, that will happen because chromium based browsers use an
internal (and older) fontconfig. A shame really. The other alternative is
to replace the files:
> 30-metric-aliases.conf
> 45-latin.conf
> 60-latin.conf
> in /etc/fonts/con
El 13/02/2016 a las 4:49 a. m., PeLo L escribió:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've followed the arch wiki and deployed a full disk encrypted install.
> Everything works fine and am able to boot properly into the install. While
> trying to shutdown my system, systemd displays an error which says "systemd:
> sto
El 13/02/2016 a las 6:28 p. m., Merlin Büge escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I thought this was obsolete since mkinitcpio 16? See
> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-December/025742.html
>
> (I'm not sure, just curious...) @OP: I had a similar issue a few
> months ago and fixed it
El 13/02/2016 a las 6:44 p. m., P. A. López-Valencia escribió:
>
> Well, it doesn't happen to me unless I add the hook. Probably it was
> true three years ago, but it got broken along the way. I customarily
> replace the udev hook with the systemd hook and not even then is the
El 14/02/2016 a las 1:49 p. m., Carsten Mattner escribió:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:23 PM, PeLo L wrote:
>> adding 'shutdown' hook doesn't seem to work. Modifying '/etc/fstab'
>> and replacing the UUID with '/dev/mapper/crypt-boot' did the trick.
> I've never used UUID volume id and still see
El 14/02/2016 a las 10:45 p. m., Eric Engeström escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> With the release of Vulkan imminent, I thought I'd prepare some packages
> for Arch so that I can push them the minute it gets released :)
>
> I was thinking of splitting it into 4 packages:
> - `vulkan-loader` with everythin
On jue, 2016-02-25 at 11:18 +0800, Fulcrum wrote:
>
You don't need this:
> set imap_authenticators=”gssapi:digest-md5:cram-md5:login”
> set smtp_authenticators=”gssapi:digest-md5:cram-md5:login”
You should always use SSL and TLS to connect to an email providerm by
the way. If it doesn't support
On jue, 2016-02-25 at 14:25 -0500, P. A. López-Valencia wrote:
>
> Outlook.com supports SSL for IMAP and TLS for SMTP on the receive
> port
> (567).
Make that port 587.
--
Pedro A. López-Valencia
http://about.me/palopezv
Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression
El 29/02/2016 a las 6:44 p. m., David C. Rankin escribió:
> All,
>
>This may be a stupid question. If so I apologize. Do I have to do anything
> different to boot the arch install media on a board with 4 Opteron 8360
> processors (16 core total), or should the kernel just handle however many
If you are have a web server facing the public internet, turn off SSLv2
immediately. OpenSSL 1.0.2g has the fix but it will take a while to drip
down to the repos as it brings with it an ABI change.
The vulnerability is so bad[1], it doesn't only have a CVE number,
CVE-2016-0800[4], but a name
On jue, 2016-03-03 at 08:37 +0100, Nicolas F. wrote:
> On 01/03/16 23:23, P. A. López-Valencia wrote:
> >
> > The vulnerability is so bad[1], it doesn't only have a CVE number,
> > CVE-2016-0800[4], but a name and its own website: HTTPS
> > DROWN[1][2][3].
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
