Re: [arch-general] Google Summer of Code 2017

2016-12-19 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
If you want to hack the kernel, you should probably go directly to kernel.org (also, search for Eudyptula).

Re: [arch-general] Hibernation not working

2017-01-02 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Regarding the difference between hibernation (suspension to disk) and suspension to RAM: Suspension to RAM just means turning off peripherals like disk and display while keeping the RAM on. Thus from your perspective you should just see the screen go black (and hear the disk spin down, if you use a

Re: [arch-general] Generating gdb debug logs for devs

2017-02-02 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
A few notes: You can use, eg., the file command to check if executables are stripped. (with something like "file /bin/executable") But gdb already tells you that no debugging symbols were found for the executable. Thus, you either need install an lxrandr package with debugging symbols (with -g an

Re: [arch-general] Generating gdb debug logs for devs

2017-02-02 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
BTW, maybe arandr would suffice as a replacement for lxrandr?

Re: [arch-general] Generating gdb debug logs for devs

2017-02-02 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
After glimpsing through your makepkg and PKGBUILD: Are you sure you are using makepkg-debug.conf instead of makepkg.conf as the config? Since you are a beginner, maybe it would have been better to first just compile lxrandr manually, instead of with makepkg.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-08 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
This discussion is pointless without legal advice. Without it disclosing user information (even if it is public) does not seem like such a good idea.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] AUR ToS (aka making AUR user names public)

2017-03-08 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
On 8 March 2017 at 20:57, Neven Sajko wrote: > This discussion is pointless without legal advice. Without it > disclosing user information (even if it is public) does not seem like > such a good idea. Not that I advocate paying a lawyer just for this issue, it would be simpler to let her scrape A

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
GCC 6 builds Archlinux.

Re: [arch-general] Link against system libs

2017-04-06 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
On 7 April 2017 at 06:07, Neven Sajko wrote: > GCC 6 builds Archlinux. It's in the base-devel group btw, along with other packages generally required for building: https://www.archlinux.org/groups/x86_64/base-devel/ Also, you might want to read the makepkg page on wiki.archlinux.org. And you ca

[arch-general] sysdig downgraded without adding a new era?

2017-04-24 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Anybody else got a "warning: sysdig: local (0.15.1-1) is newer than community (0.15.0-2)" ?

Re: [arch-general] Segmentation fault and (possibly) file system bug while removing gnome-extra

2017-05-16 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Did you notice the "kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:992" line in the kernel log? You should probably report this to the linux people. (But I'm not sure how useful those traces are to them without the rest of the line numbers...) On another note, how long did you run memtest, I think under five or

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

2018-05-09 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
I would just like to note that SHA-2 hashes are inferior to Keccak and to BLAKE2. So better not to spend effort migrating to SHA-2.

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

2018-05-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
I do agree that using md5 is absurd, but putting effort into using sha-2 seems like a waste when Keccak and BLAKE2 are both faster and more secure than the old hashes. Regards, Neven

Re: [arch-general] Stronger Hashes for PKGBUILDs

2018-05-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
On 13 May 2018 at 20:11, Neven Sajko wrote: > I do agree that using md5 is absurd, ... To clarify, md5 *is* unsecure and is even slower or not significantly faster than hashes from the Keccak and BLAKE2 families; using signatures would be a plus but signatures are not an argument for md5.

Re: [arch-general] Firefox crashes randomly

2018-09-20 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Do you get core dumps? Try doing running coredumpctl (possibly with root rights). Of course, probably the backtraces would not be useful without the debugging symbols.

[arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
To mount a root GPT partition which resides on an encrypted disk, one needs the kpartx tool to make the mapping for the partition (the kernel does not independently make those for partitions on device mapper maps, which is what a dm-crypt decrypted device is). Thus kpartx needs to be on the Archlin

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> You don’t need kpartx though. Neither losetup or LVM. I did several > encrypted GPT install without any of them, so I’m pretty confident about > this. You are probably thinking about an encrypted GPT partition. What I am talking about is an encrypted GPT. To clarify, the partition table itself (

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
To clarify, I am talking about something like this, but with GPT instead of LVM: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system#Plain_dm-crypt

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> pardon for asking, but why in the heck would you want to partition the > encrypted volume? that is going to cause tenfold headache for you down > the road. > > -- > brent saner > https://square-r00t.net/ > GPG info: https://square-r00t.net/gpg-info I need one partition for swap and one for the f

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> that... doesn't answer my question. fundamentally, and structurally, why > do you think you want this instead of GPTing the disk itself and > applying dm-crypt to the partitions? so, you know, it works with > bootloaders. I think I already explained that, if you add up my rationale for not using

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Do you need the swap to be persistent across reboots in order to support > hibernation? If not, it is sufficient to have the swap mounted with a > randomized key. I would like to be able to resume from hibernation, yes. > If you do need hibernation support, the simple method would be to use a >

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> >> If you do need hibernation support, the simple method would be to use a > >> swap file residing on the encrypted / > > > > Simple as in "already well supported", but not optimal, as swap > > depends on a filesystem. > > Linux also depends on a filesystem. I'm not sure what you mean to imply.

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> It's your lucky day! > > I just pushed it to [community] as multipath-tools, please test it. That is awesome, Robin, thank you! Does somebody know what is the procedure for getting it in the iso? I should probably start by making a feature request for the archiso package ... Regards, Neven Saj

Re: [arch-general] Kpartx should be in the repos and archiso for enabling encrypted GPT install

2019-01-13 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> This is interesting, partprobe seems to be an even lighter alternative. It seems that partprobe indeed also works for device mapper maps. Relevant links: * A commit to the (c)fdisk man page that suggests using kpartx or partprobe when the BLKRRPART ioctl fails (I wonder why that was not upstrea

[arch-general] HDMI audio input - HDMI microphone

2019-02-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Hi, I am designing a digital microphone that should send PCM (LPCM) data to a PC, and I am new to electronics. My first thought for the connection type to interface with the PC was of course USB, but then I figured that HDMI is an alternative more suited to digital audio data, and maybe simpler t

Re: [arch-general] HDMI audio input - HDMI microphone

2019-02-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Sounds like a standard thing. I'm not aware of your restrictions but I would > actually suggest looking into some pre-made Texas Instruments ADC/DAC->USB ICs > which are widely in use in existing products. Well, my MEMS microphones are actually themselves digital (PDM) so I do not need an ADC. I

Re: [arch-general] HDMI audio input - HDMI microphone

2019-02-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Prosumer, as well as professional audio interfaces work very good using > the class compliance Linux USB driver. I own a prosumer audio interface > with 18 input and 20 output channels and there are no issues using all > of them and moreover, the prosumer USB device works way better, than my > pr

Re: [arch-general] HDMI audio input - HDMI microphone

2019-02-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 19:58, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 19:07:51 +, Neven Sajko wrote: > >> Prosumer, as well as professional audio interfaces work very good > >> using the class compliance Linux USB driver. I own a prosumer audio > >> interface with 18 input and 20 output ch

Re: [arch-general] HDMI audio input - HDMI microphone

2019-02-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> As a former audio engineer who worked for one of the two famous German > microphone companies, my intuitive thought is still to prefer S/PDIF > over USB. Perhaps I'm just a dino who missed that all gear nowadays is > equipped with USB. In my experiences a lot of consumer gear provides > S/PDIF, b

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Mkinitcpio replacement with Dracut

2019-05-24 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Regarding using bash as sh: > Bash runs POSIX scripts just fine. Bash does not run some POSIX scripts fine. See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2017-08/msg00087.html , for example. In that case an executable named ^ can not be called.

Re: [arch-general] PCYNLITX project and its innovations ( for multi-threading )

2019-06-29 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
But why is it not written in Rust??

Re: [arch-general] sudo: setrlimit(RLIMIT_CORE): Operation not permitted

2019-10-31 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
It seems like your container is set up with too low of a RLIMIT_CORE rlimit for core files, causing the error when sudo attempts to increase it. Maybe you messed up a config file for Docker? See this for more info: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getrlimit.html Regards

Re: [arch-general] Adding a "posix" metapackage

2020-01-04 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Linux isn't POSIX, period! I think Linux and its userspace (musl and glibc) try the hardest to be POSIX. Don't they get the first implementations of new POSIX APIs, compared to Darwin or the BSDs?

Re: [arch-general] Adding a "posix" metapackage

2020-01-04 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Actually I wasn't interested to reply at all, I'm just curious about > information related to POSIX vs Linux, IOW I'm interested in learning > by reading, but it's a broken thread. Maybe you would like this: https://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html http://www.etalabs.net/sh_tricks.html

Re: [arch-general] libx11/xorgproto dependency

2020-01-04 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
I assume you did not hear about the following: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/64892

Re: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-16 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> ... installed by default ... > ... Is it really a feature that the user needs to know about specific > implementations? > ... always including it in an installation by default, just like the existing > swap units, rather than expecting users to manually install a package. You obviously know

Re: [arch-general] systemd-zram generator

2020-01-17 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
The fact is that pushing to get some experimental software installed and, especially, configured by default in Arch is rude from my viewpoint (as an Arch user), extremely so when * There are alternatives already in the Arch repos, while this one is not even packaged * "This is a project in rust."

[arch-general] Why are Archlinux packages stripped of (debugging) symbols?

2020-01-21 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Hello, Why is it that makepkg strips symbols by default, and many packagers even make extra effort to get packages stripped; instead of building with "-g"? Even Go software, which by Go's design makes use of debugging symbols at run time had been stripped as far as I remember (although it seems th

Re: [arch-general] Why are Archlinux packages stripped of (debugging) symbols?

2020-01-21 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> There is no "even", here. The golang programming language is not > *atypical*, it should not receive abnormal treatment. > > I'm not sure what you men by "design makes use of debugging symbols at > runtime". They're debug symbols, not runtime logic symbols. Golang (and libbacktrace) use DWARF fo

Re: [arch-general] Why are Archlinux packages stripped of (debugging) symbols?

2020-01-21 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
One thing that I should have said right away is that one can not know in advance when and which executable he will need to debug.

Re: [arch-general] Why are Archlinux packages stripped of (debugging) symbols?

2020-01-21 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Regarding the firefox example, are the split debugging symbols files publicly available?

Re: [arch-general] ssh askpass problem after todays updates to qt 5.14.1

2020-01-27 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
> Wonder if the latter really is qt4 or just needs to be renamed. Perhaps ldd could help you to check? Just run "ldd /path/to/executable" to see (recursively) all the shared libraries the executable dynamically links to. If in need of a more advanced tool, Ghidra could be it (but it is not package

Re: [arch-general] FS#65265 - community/dolphin-emu 1:5.0.r11530.ea9b96370d-1 conflicts with discord-rpc-api (I don't agree with Scimmia decision)

2020-01-29 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
It is not really fair to say that Krzysztof's bug report was "incorrect". But, sure it would have been more clear to omit referring to an unofficial repo. Regards, Neven

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Potential removal of Chromium in ~2 months

2020-02-23 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
What Geo said.

Re: [arch-general] Problem with reflector

2020-03-07 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
I have not fully understood your situation, but can you not just change the PATH environment variable?

[arch-general] pacman -Rnus inetutils

2020-10-24 Thread Neven Sajko via arch-general
Today pacman surprised me after updating my system: turns out nothing on my installation depended on inetutils any more, so I removed it, even though it was there forever. The following reboot proceeded fine. I'm curious if somebody knows which packages dropped it as a dependency lately. Regards,