[arch-general] glibc 2.7 for i586

2007-12-06 Thread Mister Dobalina
Just a heads up if there are still any other i586 archers out there: glibc 2.7 needs an extra patch to compile for CHOST=i586. PLD Linux has the patch here: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SOURCES/glibc-i586-build-fix.patch Cheers. Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift

[arch-general] flac makedepends on xmms ??

2007-12-13 Thread Mister Dobalina
xmms hasn't been in the official repositories for some time, IIRC. Looking for a X-Mas gift? Everybody needs a Flickr Pro Account. http://www.flickr.com/gift/

Re: [arch-general] flac makedepends on xmms ??

2007-12-14 Thread Mister Dobalina
oops, sorry for the top-post, bad habit... :) Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/

Re: [arch-general] flac makedepends on xmms ??

2007-12-14 Thread Mister Dobalina
fin wrote: > > > On Dec 13, 2007 10:55 PM, Mister Dobalina > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> xmms hasn't been in the official repositories for > some > >> time, IIRC. > > > > Please file a bug report > > > > > > > > FYI,

[arch-general] missing /usr/lib/libstdc++.la / kdelibs won't build

2007-12-14 Thread Mister Dobalina
I know you'll tell to file a bug report, but I like to get people's opinion on this ;) So I'm trying to build kdelibs, but after building some kwallet stuff it fails with grep & sed complaining about there being no /usr/lib/libstdc++.la file, which is odd, since gcc-libs has options=(!libtool). O

Re: [arch-general] problem compiling for i586 with new makepkg

2007-12-15 Thread Mister Dobalina
--- Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a hint, since you were looking to add i586 - > find and sed are > your friends. :D > > find -name PKGBUILD -exec sed -i '/^arch=/ { /i586/ > !{ > s/^arch=(/arch=(i586 / } }' {} \; > > That will find every PKGBUILD and add i586 to the > packag

Re: [arch-general] problem compiling for i586 with new makepkg

2007-12-16 Thread Mister Dobalina
--- Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I added i586 when I did it the last time, > one year ago, with the > result that it was practically hopeless to diff with > the original, when doing > an update with "abs". So this time, I just ignore to > put in i586, making it > ea