isn't being
> propagated to the mirrors.
Packagers aren't required to subscribe to arch-general, so it's best to
create a bugreport for this issue.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 02/06/18 at 09:18pm, freq via arch-general wrote:
> Shown here for ARM: https://archlinuxarm.org/packages "Showing 1 to 500 of
> 33,249 entries" at the bottom of the page.
> And for Official: "9922 matching packages found. Page 1 of 100." at the
> bottom of https://www.archlinux.org/packages/.
On 03/13/18 at 03:17pm, PkmX via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK this is the exact case of gcc bugzilla #84607:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84607
>
> As this is an upstream bug this should affect all distributions, maybe
> the commenter on Debian is using 7.3.1 so he can
.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=258061
As I suggested, create a bugtracker issue for gcc on our bugtracker
otherwise you'll have to wait on a new gcc minor release.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
on based on experience, the arch admins/devs will know why
> bugzilla is the right choice. I trust them.
Please don't de-rail the thread. (Obviously the Arch devs also want a
performing bugtracker, but Flyspray has to go either way)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>
> > I wonder, Is it really important to have that split?
> > --
> > Sudarshan Kakoty
> >
>
> simply saying.
> community is TU managed repo; mostly from AUR by vote.
To be clear, votes don't matter for a package to be moved to
[community]. Some popular packages with many votes simply can't enter
the repository due to licensing or no interest of the TU's to maintain
it.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
wiki but none of
> them seem to properly solve the problem for me.
Check the logs
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
amp;protocol=https&ip_version=4&use_mirror_status=on
> >
> >
> > I get a list with all mirrors at the moment and not just the ones where
> > the above parameters apply.
>
> Known issue.
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/58304
And the fix i
t; Is the systemd in ArchLinux packaged correctly?
Well it might be an upstream bug, since the man page is installed but
the binary.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
re it with you. You can also search for past
> > presentations
> > by devs/tus. I would ask their permission though, before using any of
> > their slides
> > templates.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Giancarlo Razzolini
>
> Yes. Here[1] are the slides. I've pinge
maintain your own kernel then. Also kpatch is really geared to updating
your kernel for security issues and not updating to a newer version. [1]
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kernel_live_patching
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 01/01/19 at 03:41pm, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> had someone run wireguard?`I have read today about it and try to run
> it through the Tutorial
Yes
>
> https://emanuelduss.ch/2018/09/wireguard-vpn-road-warrior-setup/
I would recommend our wiki article [1]. Do you have ipv4 fo
On 01/01/19 at 04:46pm, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:49:36 +0100
> Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>
> > I would recommend our wiki article [1]. Do you have ipv4 forwarding
> > enabled and configured your firwewall correctly?
>
> Forwarding is enable
On 03/16/19 at 10:59pm, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 13:24, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> > suggest replacing xz with lzip as xz has quite a few flaws in its file
> > format.
>
> I seem to remember that this has been debunked/ruled out as irrelevant
> to package distribution every time it
support attaching patches. Since there is
also a bug open for your issue, please leave the discussion there :)
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 08/04/19 at 03:28pm, adérito wrote:
> Hello you can help me to install talkingarch send me the commands to install
> talkingarch.
This is the 4th time you emailed the same message, please refrain from
bumping your topic every day.
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Descriptio
On 08/14/19 at 03:40pm, Jack Wu wrote:
> Well why not connect the channel with the group on Telegram by using a
> bot? It will be nice.
This is against the channel ToS, we do not allow anyone to bridge the
channel to an external service. One of the most obvious reasons is that
everything via the b
On 01/20/20 at 06:54pm, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote:
> I've already opened a bug issue, and supplied a patch at
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65006
> but except from the first comment by dreisner, there's not much activity.
>
> Is it ok if I escalate here? :)
>
> Alternatively,
t packagers might be busy, have limited time or various
rebuilds need to happen. For samba for example there is an updated
version in [testing]. For libelf, a rebuild is required which might make
sense to wait until binutils has support for debuginfod so we don't have
to rebuild it twice. [1]
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65406
--
Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 02/24/20 at 03:31pm, Marco via arch-general wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I run into the problem of outdated package "animate" contained in
> texlive-latexextra. With the current version of the package, xelatex
> is not able to embed animations at least when using png frames. At the
> contrary, pdfla
On 04/04/2020 12:11, Pascal via arch-general wrote:
> I don't quite understand where the reproducibility is broken ?
multi-threaded compression does not create a predictable reproducible
archive (for xz/zstd).
> Amin Vakil says that rebuilding his initrd (when updating kernel and/or
> modules) ta
On 05/05/2020 17:42, C Schu via arch-general wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I use mothly update repo:
>
> Server=https://archive.archlinux.org/repos/month/$repo/os/$arch
>
> For years it works without problem but now it doesnt work ?!
Given your limited information, I assume you mean
https://archive.archlin
On 18/10/2020 17:29, LuKaRo wrote:
> On 7/22/20 9:18 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini via arch-general wrote:
>> Em julho 22, 2020 14:31 LuKaRo escreveu:
>>> Thanks for clarifying :) Does that mean that gitlab.archlinux.org is
>>> meant to replace git.archlinux.org in the long run, and GitHub will
>>> be ju
201 - 223 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
