Re: [arch-general] script to reformat 'pacman -Ss' output into 2 readable columns (prevents blindness)

2010-08-05 Thread Jason Reardon
Sweet script, it always bothered me the way pacman -Ss formatted its output. The check you do for zenity has a minor problem, though. Instead of "if which zenity > /dev/null..." it needs to be "if which zenity &> /dev/null...", the former doesn't redirect error output. Anyway, very well done, than

Re: [arch-general] rankmirrors and new mirrrorlist format

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Reardon
Worked for me on the latest mirrorlist release. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Mathias Huber wrote: > Dear Archers, > > is it true that rankmirrors can't handle mirrorlist urls like > ftp://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch? > > While pacman works fine with this format, rankmi

Re: [arch-general] rankmirrors and new mirrrorlist format

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Reardon
://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/linux/distributions/archlinux/$repo/os/$arch > > > These are obviously not reachable URLs, but pacman fills in $repo and $arch > from pacman.conf so it's working just fine for me. > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jason Reardon >wrote: > &

Re: [arch-general] rankmirrors and new mirrrorlist format

2010-08-12 Thread Jason Reardon
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 13/08/10 07:09, Jason Reardon wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Erik Johnson wrote: >> >> Can you post a copy of the output? I'm using reflector and rankmirrors, >>> and >

[arch-general] flashplugin

2010-08-26 Thread Jason Reardon
I just noticed flashplugin x86_64 in the 'Recent Updates' section of the frontpage. Adobe is supporting Flash for 64 bit Linux again?

Re: [arch-general] flashplugin

2010-08-26 Thread Jason Reardon
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:44 PM, Jason Reardon wrote: > >> I just noticed flashplugin x86_64 in the 'Recent Updates' section of the >> frontpage. Adobe is supporting Flash for 64 bit Linux again? >> > > no

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] db-5.1 rebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jason Reardon
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae: > > db-5.1.19-2 > > heimdal-1.3.3-2 > > iproute2-2.3.25-2 > > libsasl-2.1.23-5 > > pam-1.1.1-2 > > perl-5.12.1-3 > > signoff i686 > > -- > Gaetan > I installed db from testing. Now when I run `pacman

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] db-5.1 rebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jason Reardon
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > On 02/11/10 12:19, Jason Reardon wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Gaetan Bisson >> wrote: >> >> [2010-11-01 19:26:31 +1000] Allan McRae: >>> >>>> db-5.1.19-2 >>>&g

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] db-5.1 rebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jason Reardon
2010/11/1 Ng Oon-Ee > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 22:42 -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote: > > On 11/01/2010 10:37 PM, Jason Reardon wrote: > > > I'm somewhat of a mailing list lurker. I've read before that one thing > Arch > > > is lacking in are normal users tes

Re: [arch-general] bad login attempts not written to /var/log/btmp

2011-07-27 Thread Jason Reardon
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Renato wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:52:24 +1000 > Simon Perry wrote: > > > On 27/07/11, Renato wrote: > > > > | no, didn't know it conflicted with lastb. However, stopping it > > doesn't | change the situtation, bad logins aren't logged > > to /var/log/btmp. |