On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:17:33PM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
>> I think namcap ignores dependencies in the 'base' group, since
>> everyone is expected to have base installed, maybe? I'm not 100% sure
>> of its internals in this sense.
>
> That soun
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:55:26AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>> Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
>>
>> Can I get a copy of the PKGBUILD to test with? It sou
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:47:11AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>> Ok, after building the PKGBUILD and running namcap on it, I got these
>> messages:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ namcap c3270-3.3.7p1-1-i686.pk
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:03:17PM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>
>> What does readelf -d /usr/bin/c3270 tell you? Namcap doesn't actually use
>> ldd, it uses something faster and more accurate.
>
>
Hey everyone,
At work we're moving over to using Amazon EC2 and since we use arch
for development, I've created arch images for everyone to be able to
benefit from.
Each one is labelled based on the date it was created. They are
bare bones.
The two ami names are
32bit: ami-3132d758
64bit: ami
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:05:18AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 2:27 AM, Aspersieman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Jason Chu wrote:
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > At work we're moving over to using Amazon EC2 and since
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:52:21PM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> RedShift schrieb:
You guys just don't get it. This is about _principle_.
>>>
>>> YOUR principle.
>>
>> Yes, and guess where I got them from. Arch, 3 years ago.
> There is in fact a valid reason why we should not hardcode devpts
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Archers,
>
> in the past weeks there was a little discussion in the forums about the
> purpose of ABS vs. AUR and when to use which of both tools. Srcpac was
> mentioned as being the right tool to install customized pack
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan McGee wrote:
>> I agree, this is a smart move. My only real thought is why have
>> anything in /etc/ at all? It would be great if this could all be done
>> non-root for editing any config settings and such. Maybe ~/.src
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loui wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 May 2008 10:20:37 -0700
>> "Jason Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Would it be an idea to build as the original users who ran srcpac?
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Chu wrote:
>> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then I'll release a new
>> version of srcpac.
>
> Ok, almost finished, though one problem remains. Using nobody actually do
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Chu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Michael Klier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Jason Chu wrote:
>> >> Yeah, put those in your public repo too and then
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Loui Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 05:36:17PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:52:45 -0600, "Aaron Griffin"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
