[arch-general] Is ncurses in Arch Linux out-dated?

2016-08-21 Thread Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general
Hi Archers, ncurses 6.0 is released in 2015/08/08. It has some bugs and part of them are fixed. For example, I was just hit by http://bugs.python.org/issue27323. On bug-ncurses mailing list there are some patch versions. The latest one is 6.0-20160820: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ncurses

Re: [arch-general] Is ncurses in Arch Linux out-dated?

2016-08-21 Thread Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general
Thanks Maarten, now I know my next step :) On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Maarten de Vries wrote: > > > On 21 August 2016 at 15:40, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > >> Hi Archers, >> >> ncurses 6.0 is released in 2

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

2016-09-01 Thread Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have > a problem then get the git version from the AUR > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, < > arch-g

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

2016-09-01 Thread Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Antonio Rojas wrote: > Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > > > To be more specific, I'm talking about youtube-dl. I'm currently one of > > youtube-dl maintainers, and I hope Arch users can always get the latest > > versi

Re: [arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

2016-09-01 Thread Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Kwang Moo Yi via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 01/09/16 20:32, Chi Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: > >> Yep that's my expectation. There were several times, that a new version >> with important fixes (fix

Re: [arch-general] Implement sql/sqlite database for pacman local database

2016-10-21 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Robin via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > I was curious why does 'pacman -Q' operations took longer than 'apt' > > counterparts. > Sounds interesting but I have a few question about how did you measure > this and how big the difference

[arch-general] Cannot no longer resolve local hostname with the new nsswitch.conf

2016-11-08 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
Hi Arch enthuasiasts, With testing/filesystem 2016.11-2, I can no longer use my local hostname to acess services on the local machine. For example: $ hostname PC12574 $ ping PC12574 ping: PC12574: Name or service not known Seems changes in nsswitch.conf [1] does the effect. If I change the host

Re: [arch-general] Cannot no longer resolve local hostname with the new nsswitch.conf

2016-11-08 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Chi-Hsuan Yen wrote: > Hi Arch enthuasiasts, > > With testing/filesystem 2016.11-2, I can no longer use my local hostname > to acess services on the local machine. For example: > > $ hostname > PC12574 > > $ ping PC12574 > ping: PC12574: Name or service not known >

Re: [arch-general] Cannot no longer resolve local hostname with the new nsswitch.conf

2016-11-08 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:37 PM Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > Hi Arch enthuasiasts, > > > > With

Re: [arch-general] Cannot no longer resolve local hostname with the new nsswitch.conf

2016-11-08 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 8 November 2016 at 13:37, Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general > wrote: > > Hi Arch enthuasiasts, > > > > With testing/filesystem 2016.11-2, I can no lon

Re: [arch-general] Cannot no longer resolve local hostname with the new nsswitch.conf

2016-11-08 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Damjan Georgievski via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 8 November 2016 at 18:43, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) via > arch-general wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:01:32 +0100 > > Damjan Georgievski via arch-general wrote: > > > >> > $ getent -s

Re: [arch-general] valgrind - memory exclusion files on the fritz?

2016-11-22 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:26 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > All, > > valgrind is reporting an additional allocation and free along with and > additional 1M of memory used. Below, 11 bytes should be allocated and freed. > Instead valgrind reports 1035 bytes. (it's worse if you use strdup). For > e

Re: [arch-general] valgrind - memory exclusion files on the fritz?

2016-11-23 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:46 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 11/23/2016 12:31 AM, Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: >> In glibc, printf calls malloc. See >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6743034/does-fprintf-use-malloc-under-the-hood > > Yes, > > Tha

Re: [arch-general] valgrind - memory exclusion files on the fritz?

2016-11-24 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 8:45 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 11/23/2016 08:49 AM, Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote: >> As far as I know it's impossible (yet) to skip specific functions in >> memory usage counters. Only memory leak reports can be filtered. And >>

[arch-general] PHP 7.1.0 not compatible with latest stable ownCloud in [community]

2016-12-06 Thread Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general
Hi Arch enthusiasts, I've just upgraded to testing/php 7.1.0-2. Now my ownCloud installation only displays a short notice on its index.php: This version of ownCloud is not compatible with PHP 7.1. You are currently running 7.1.0. Please use at least ownCloud 9.2.0. However, seems ownCloud 9.2