It works well on my laptop.
Signoff i686
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Matej Ľach wrote:
> I support this idea.
> Keep most games in AUR and the more popular ones can have their own repo
> [games] on a separate server.
> This server could be community financed using donations and if not enough
> interest will be raised for new repo, a
Hi,
Signoff i686
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Signoff i686
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Hi Lorenzo,
I updated today my KDE desktop and transparency in the panel is gone.
Less troubles than you but... :P
Tomorrow I should try to move my settings directory to a backup location
and try in a clean environment.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Hi archers and KDE users,
Can I have confirm of a strange behaviour in my KDE?
I can't open, in KControl (the control center), the shortcut and gestures
configuration dialog: when i double-click the item, KControl freezes.
Sometimes the configuration center for shortcuts opens up itself after a
lot
I'm sorry, now it seems to be ok for me too. A reboot, and all is over :)
Kmixer wasn't in its place, and I didn't manage to launch softwares with my
custom shortcuts; now I can.
I will inform you if it happens again, thanks for your feedback!
Bl@ster
Oh I see.
Thanks for the tip Paul! :)
Bl@ster
2011/12/8 Angel Velásquez
>
> Good for you!, but you can have several DE, or WM in Linux world.
>
> So, eventually, you should "evolve" and not be tied to just one of
> them ;).
I switched to KDE, and I'm giving GNOME a chance every time it hits a new
release.
Unfortunately, that isn't "my" DE a
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> 0.02€,
>
> Ralf
>
You won man. :D
Salud,
Bl@ster
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Do I have the better arguments or is it, that I'm the king of clowns aka
> the completely idiot ;)?
I agree with your mail, but I laughed reading that conclusion :P
Double win? ;)
Salud,
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
> Will that effect xfce-gnome compatibility?
>
I believe so.
But XFCE developers will fix that in time for the next release; I believe
they're waiting for this right now to be ready to patch softwares in the
last chunk of development cycle f
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:54:30 +0100
> schrieb "Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana" :
I hope this will not happen. I never liked Gnome for a lot of reasons,
> and KDE4 and the fact that Xfce is so different from Gnome w
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi <
lenzi.ser...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I will be testing xfce this week on a fresh generated FreeBSD 9.0
>
I don't like BSD, especially for modern environments. Linux has a more
modern architecture; I love the system, but i must admit that
I simply believe that a man should know how Linux works, and not how Arch
Linux or Debian or Fedora works.
Basic approach, not distro-oriented approach. So I agree with Allan, you
can't be depending on a single distro, you need to know how to deal with
every single Linux system (major distros at le
However, I think Arch is a good distro for every purpose, from desktop to
server, because of it's usercentricness.
If you break something, you can fall back and most of the times, if you
broke a system component, it's your fault.
There's [testing] and maintainers don't push unattended dangerous upg
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
>
> Ignorance should never be an excuse for a rude response, at least when
> ignorance isn't accompanied by the obvious willingness to remain
> ignorant.
Epic quotation, coudn't agree more.
And as Don said, I think that a Linux user doctor
Maybe you need the linux-headers package. ;)
Salud,
Alessio
I installed Linux 3.3.1 yesterday, wifi authentication over protected
networks is definitely broken for ath9k.
I can connect to open networks, but if I try to connect to a WPA/WPA2 net
(didn't try with WEP), after this I can't connect to ANY net (open too).
ath9k is totally blown up, I hope next r
Maintaining slim doen't seem a big effort; I'd stay with lightdm *and* slim
in [extra].
2012/5/8 Christian Hesse
> John Hutchison on Tue, 2012/05/08 03:53:
> > Am 08.05.2012 03:35, schrieb Christian Hesse:
> > > I propose to drop slim from [extra] and replace it with lightdm and
> > > lightdm-g
2012/5/8 Gaetan Bisson
> [2012-05-08 11:37:06 +0200] Alessio 'Blaster' Biancalana:
> > Maintaining slim doen't seem a big effort;
>
> Great. Then you can do just that in the AUR.
I'd like to have a pre-compiled package, as I'm very lazy :D
It's a
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches
If user signoff are accepted, this boots and runs fine on my machine.
Signoff i686.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
If you accept signoffs from users, my machine boots and runs fine
after the update.
Signoff i686.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
>Aug 19 15:18:03 localhost kernel: [608984.681025] xhci_hcd
>:02:00.0: WARN: Stalled endpoint
Hi,
Do you have a USB 3.0 controller/disk?
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Uli Armbruster
wrote:
> My problem is, in vim the right and left arrow keys don't do anything in
> command mode
I confirm keys working fine in every mode.
Did you try a pacman -S vim?
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Hector Martinez-Seara
wrote:
> Any body knows what happened?
Uhm.
Tried searching for ":02:00.0: WARN: Stalled endpoint" on Google,
and I found a considerable amount of complains about Linux (2.6.38-39,
3) and USB 3.0 controllers.
I think that's an upstream b
Hi Tim,
Does your version complain about GCC and other jibber jabber?
I need to know if your fork compiles fine under Arch, especially the
GTK frontend.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Did you think to provide a stable tarball?
I don't think git clone is a good idea for an extra and stable package ;)
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
I like the idea, this seems KISS as it is now.
It could be a better way to manage services, kudos!
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> The question is, can a few lines of shell code (as has been
> demonstrated by the bugfix in the bug report above), manage the
> problem sufficiently? If yes, then a full, separate program to handle
> this stuff is _not_ KISS.
I thought so but...
Hi Carlos,
Did you rebuilt the vboxdrv module and load it?
If you didn't, do it and let us know.
If you did and receive the error message again, you must check
permissions on /dev/vboxdrv.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Carlos Alberto Ospina
wrote:
> Ready, my machine works. Thanks a lot
No problem, hasta luego :)
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Hello guys,
I require you to test some stuff.
Trying to compile OpenVAS, I get Error 2 or some other things.
Now I ask, it's my fault or...?
Let me know if openvas-libraries in AUR builds fine for you ;)
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Thanks Ionut, thanks Karol,
I'll ask in aur-general, or patch the software myself.
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Alex Ferrando wrote:
>
> Libreoffice from testing seems a build behind:
>
> testing/libreoffice-common 3.4.3-3 (libreoffice) [installed]
>common files for LibreOffice - a productivity suite that is compatible
> with other major office suites
> extra/libreoffic
2012/8/19 Anthony ''Ishpeck'' Tedjamulia
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 01:23:12PM +0200, Roel Deckers wrote:
> > Remember it's not about whether or not you're allowed to use
> > initscripts/systemd, it's about what will become the default.
>
> No, maintaining both boot methods, even if upstream weren
2012/8/19 C Anthony Risinger
>
> IMO its very refreshing to finally see these deficiencies being tackled.
Linux landscape had been thirsty for years about these decisions. I like
very much the Arch approach to this matter and, as I said, I like systemd
as my init system.
While I agree with the guys saying the Beginner's Guide was harmful to the
distro making lazy noobish users choose the wrong distribution for 'em, I
strongly think that the Guide was pretty helpful as a quick setup checklist
to seniors too.
The solution to this could be taking it back enriching th
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> Just take a look at that beautifully concise "Contents" table on
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_guide.
> That's one perfect checklist :-)
>
I think you are ~right.
>From my point of view beginner's guide was a perfect ent
Am I the only one that can't understand the reason of this thread?
Ale
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Zachary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Mauro Santos via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> >
> > Third party installers are not supported in any shape or f
40 matches
Mail list logo
