Re: [arch-general] Update delayed for more of two months, Lyx v2.1.4

2016-06-08 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 06/07/16 at 08:54pm, Xavier Corredor Llano via arch-general wrote: > Hi guys, > > Again the maintainer of Lyx [1] is so delay for update this package, here > [2] is the pkgbuild > updated and tested, can any TUs update this? Only developers have access to the extra repo. > > Thanks > > [

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general
Hi, Same issue here: For the last few weeks I got plenty of e-mails from the Arch MLs sent to spam. Since I've tweaked Gmail's filters it seems to be OK now. On 16-06-08 14:49:14, Syrone Wong via arch-general wrote: > Hi, > > You can add a filter in gmail, set > `list:"arch-general@archlinux.or

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 08.06.2016 um 10:34 schrieb Pierre Neidhardt via arch-general: > On 16-06-08 14:49:14, Syrone Wong via arch-general wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Sri Krishna via arch-general dear pierre, syrone and Srikrishna, please respect the new community code of conduct and stop top posting

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 08.06.2016 06:26, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for > those messages. That's weird. For me the signatures very just fine. Could you show me the exact error you get (assuming there is one)? Maybe also run the full mail (so

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Maarten de Vries via arch-general
On 8 June 2016 at 10:55, Florian Pritz via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 08.06.2016 06:26, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for > > those messages. > > That's weird. For me the signatures very just fin

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Dragon ryu via arch-general
also, word checking as well. 2016/06/08 18:18 "Maarten de Vries via arch-general" < arch-general@archlinux.org>: > On 8 June 2016 at 10:55, Florian Pritz via arch-general < > arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > On 08.06.2016 06:26, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > > > dkim header remark

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 06/08/2016 04:55 AM, Florian Pritz via arch-general wrote: > On 08.06.2016 06:26, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: >> dkim header remarks indicate either failed or missing dkim sigs for >> those messages. > > That's weird. For me the signatures very just fine. Could you show me > the exact

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Ben Oliver via arch-general
I have been meaning to write here about this issue too, 70% of ML stuff has been going straight to spam. A way to quickly create filters is to click the little drop down arrow at the top of the message, next to the 'to Foo'. Next to the 'mailing list:' title, there's a button that says 'filter mes

[arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

2016-06-08 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous kernel modules as well as adding them to the new kernel. In the real old days these were not removed at all - so removal is a good thing. The issue is that the old kernel is still running and until machine is rebooted the modules won

Re: [arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

2016-06-08 Thread Bruno Pagani
Le 08/06/2016 à 20:03, Genes Lists via arch-general a écrit : > When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous kernel > modules as well as adding them to the new kernel. > > In the real old days these were not removed at all - so removal is a > good thing. > The issue is that the

Re: [arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

2016-06-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 06/08/2016 02:03 PM, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: > When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous kernel > modules as well as adding them to the new kernel. > > In the real old days these were not removed at all - so removal is a > good thing. > The issue is that the o

Re: [arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

2016-06-08 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 14:03:18 -0400, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: >Is there a way to mark the deletion to happen after the new >kernel is booted ?  > >I may well be missing something of course. What you're missing is, that the directory names in /lib/modules/ differ, but not the kernel names

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 08.06.2016 11:18, Maarten de Vries wrote: > ​Gmail imposes more strict checks on email coming in over IPv6, with​ > the rationale that IPv6 enabled machines are more modern and thus should > be configured properly for newer verification techniques. Now that is something I totally missed when I

Re: [arch-general] ML is being sent to Spam by Gmail

2016-06-08 Thread Florian Pritz via arch-general
On 08.06.2016 17:18, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > In one, I see: > Authentication-Results: luna.archlinux.org; > dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) > header.d=dray-be.20150623.gappssmtp.com > header.i=@dray-be.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=lZvs/tYM

Re: [arch-general] mdmonitor.service /usr/lib/systemd/scripts/mdadm_env.sh: No such file or directory

2016-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/05/2016 07:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote: > On 06/05/2016 06:12 PM, David N Murray via arch-general wrote: >> I don't think it's any problem at all. I've always had this message and >> mdadm >> starts and runs fine. I think this has been discussed on the list before. >> It's >> an optiona

Re: [arch-general] mdmonitor.service /usr/lib/systemd/scripts/mdadm_env.sh: No such file or directory

2016-06-08 Thread Wilhelm Schuster
Hi David, On 06/09/2016 12:05 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Now we have a conundrum, the mdadm folks seem to think the missing file is an > Arch problem: > > (from linux-r...@vger.kernel.org, contributing redhat dev): > > On 06/07/2016 02:31 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> "David C. Rankin" writes: >

Re: [arch-general] mdmonitor.service /usr/lib/systemd/scripts/mdadm_env.sh: No such file or directory

2016-06-08 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/08/2016 05:22 PM, Wilhelm Schuster wrote: > That's a weird, since mdadm_env.sh only gets installed on SUSE systems. > See the following line from the Makefile (line 316): > > if [ -f /etc/SuSE-release -o -n "$(SUSE)" ]; then > $(INSTALL) -D -m 755 systemd/SUSE-mdadm_env.sh \ > $(DESTDIR)$(

Re: [arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

2016-06-08 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 20:05 +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote: > Le 08/06/2016 à 20:03, Genes Lists via arch-general a écrit : > > > When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous > > kernel > > ... > > That’s expected, and in fact the same thing happens for normal kernel > module. I do

Re: [arch-general] mdmonitor.service /usr/lib/systemd/scripts/mdadm_env.sh: No such file or directory

2016-06-08 Thread Martin Kühne via arch-general
Smells like EPROBLEM. If there's no problem beyond logspam, you'll have a hard time to get the improvement accepted. Question though, now that you made me curious, do you patch out gtk debug messages for your GUI apps? cheers! mar77i

[arch-general] pacman question - missing files (repost)

2016-06-08 Thread Genes Lists via arch-general
(Reposting in plain text - so sorry - been using thunderbird which automatically does that for mail lists - now with it's impending demise I am trying other mailers - like evolution ... ) I've seen this behavior a couple of times now. Here's what happened today. After installing systemd and libsy

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 140, Issue 10

2016-06-08 Thread Information Technology Works
On 06/08/2016 08:00 PM, arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org wrote: > been using thunderbird which > automatically does that for mail lists - now with it's impending demise > I am trying other mailers https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/files/2016/04/Finding-a-Home-for-Thunderbird.pdf