Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Mauro Santos
On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build > modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the end. Not sure triggering grub update automagically is a good idea, I maintain grub.cfg myself and

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Doug Newgard
On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:13:51 +0100 Mauro Santos wrote: > On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > > Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build > > modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the > > end. > > Not sure triggering

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Mauro Santos
On 19-05-2016 13:33, Doug Newgard wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2016 13:13:51 +0100 > Mauro Santos wrote: > >> On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build >>> modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub up

Re: [arch-general] Problem with pacman hooks, alphabetic order.

2016-05-19 Thread LoneVVolf
On 14-05-16 01:15, Carsten Feuls wrote: Hello Everybody, I have some trouble with pacman hooks. Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package. etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any trouble. But now it becomes more tricky to run. My Problem is that the pac

Re: [arch-general] Problem with pacman hooks, alphabetic order.

2016-05-19 Thread Christian Hesse
LoneVVolf on Thu, 2016/05/19 17:24: > On 14-05-16 01:15, Carsten Feuls wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > > > I have some trouble with pacman hooks. > > Arch is going to use pacman hooks in every package. > > etckeeper was one of the first package that use pacman hooks, without any > > trouble. > > B

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Carsten Mattner
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build >> modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the end. > > Not sure triggering grub update

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Stefan Tatschner
On 19.05.2016 22:24, Carsten Mattner wrote: >> I'd guess everyone that maintains their own grub.cfg would really >> appreciate not having a bad surprise after a kernel update. But as a sysadmin I can configure my own hooks in /etc/hooks, right? So, I could optionally add a hook which upates grub.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH 1/1] move initramfs generation from install script to pacman hook

2016-05-19 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: > On 19-05-2016 00:20, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >> Could we use a prefix convention to order our hooks? It's usefull to build >> modules before building initramfs and eventually run grub update at the end. > > Not sure triggering grub update