Hi.
Firefox 44.0 does not seem to allow installing the firefox-adblock-plus
addon package from the Arch community repository. Instead, Firefox states
that it only allows addons "signed" by Mozilla to be installed. That seems
to exclude the package mentioned.
I could install the adblock-plus add
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 11:45 -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
> is there a better idea?
> Any opinions?
uBlock Origin
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 2016-01-31 um 17:45 schrieb Francis Gerund:
Hi.
Firefox 44.0 does not seem to allow installing the firefox-adblock-plus
addon package from the Arch community repository. Instead, Firefox states
that it only allows addons "signed" by Mozilla to be installed. That seems
to exclude the package
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:58:57 +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>Besides this I would suggest some improvements in the default settings
Defaults that differ from Upstream, such as removing everything Google
related from about:config or what kind of "improvements"? I guess Arch
users expect to get de
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 18:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I guess Arch
> users expect to get defaults that most closely correspond to Upstream.
Yes. The relevant bug report is here.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45900
This was also covered in a mailing list thread earlier this month.
https://lis
Am 2016-01-31 um 18:07 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:58:57 +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Besides this I would suggest some improvements in the default settings
Defaults that differ from Upstream, such as removing everything Google
related from about:config or what kind of "im
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 12:15:13 -0500, Jonathan Roemer wrote:
>On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 18:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> I guess Arch users expect to get defaults that most closely
>> correspond to Upstream.
>
>Yes. The relevant bug report is here.
>https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/45900
To disable
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:38:15 +0100
Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Am 2016-01-31 um 18:07 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> > On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:58:57 +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> >> Besides this I would suggest some improvements in the default settings
> >
> > Defaults that differ from Upstream,
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:38:15 +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
>duckduckgo
For me duckduckgo is completely useless.
>ixquick
Most of the times I'm using startpage.
However, I'm not talking about the Google search engine, but about
"safe browsing" and other Google features used by Firefox.
I wou
I think everyone is missing the point: the firefox-adblock-plus package[1]
is broken since it does not work with the latest version of Firefox.
It should probably be dropped from the repositories. I've opened a bug
report.[1]
[1] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47970
Hello all:
I just installed Chromium, v. 48.0.2564.97, two days ago. I imported
my bookmarks from Firefox and enabled the bookmarks bar. I added a few
new bookmarks to the bar, but not in my existing folders.
Today, I tried to drag-and-drop the bookmarks into the folders on my
bookmarks bar, b
> I just installed Chromium, v. 48.0.2564.97, two days ago. I imported
> my bookmarks from Firefox and enabled the bookmarks bar. I added a few
> new bookmarks to the bar, but not in my existing folders.
>
> Today, I tried to drag-and-drop the bookmarks into the folders on my
> bookmarks bar, but
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:08:16PM +0100, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> > I just installed Chromium, v. 48.0.2564.97, two days ago. I imported
> > my bookmarks from Firefox and enabled the bookmarks bar. I added a few
> > new bookmarks to the bar, but not in my existing folders.
> >
> > Today, I tr
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:25:56 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> For me duckduckgo is completely useless.
You never use '!archpkg firefox' or '!archwiki firefox'? The nice thing
about duckduckgo is the use of bangs (and for me that i don't need
to remember the original url :) ).
> However, I'm not talki
14 matches
Mail list logo
