Re: [arch-general] package bup marked out-of-date for several months

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Rashif Ray Rahman > wrote: > >> Anyway, you can always e-mail the maintainer if you want to enquire or >> help. >> > > That's a good suggestion, I'll do that in the future. > > Thanks for the responses! > > > Zander Bolgar > In the future, if you need t

Re: [arch-general] Why couldn't pacman resolve the dependency?

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > the problem could be solved by installing the problematic dependency > first, but why couldn't pacman -Syu not resolve the dependency? > > This is what happened: > > [long snip] I think that what happened is that pacman only installs

Re: [arch-general] package bup marked out-of-date for several months

> > In the future, if you need to immediately bump a package, you could use > the ABS. > Emailing the maintainer is the best ultimate option, but upping the > version number in the ABS will usually work in the meantime. > > What do you mean by upping the version number in the ABS? Just bump the ver

Re: [arch-general] package bup marked out-of-date for several months

> In the future, if you need to immediately bump a package, you could use > the ABS. I prefer asp, it gets you the svntogit sources which are more up to date. AUR package, links to asp homepage: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asp-git