Re: [arch-general] RAID-0 kernel bug

2015-05-23 Thread Florian Pritz
On 23.05.2015 03:12, Francis Gerund wrote: > Am I correct to assume that this would ONLY affect systems that include a > RAID-0 filesystem, and that it would not affect other ext4 systems using > SSDs with "discard" in /etc/fstab? It affects all file systems when used with discard on a raid0 devic

Re: [arch-general] RAID-0 kernel bug

2015-05-23 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/23/2015 02:55 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: On 23.05.2015 03:12, Francis Gerund wrote: Am I correct to assume that this would ONLY affect systems that include a RAID-0 filesystem, and that it would not affect other ext4 systems using SSDs with "discard" in /etc/fstab? It affects all file syst

Re: [arch-general] RAID-0 kernel bug

2015-05-23 Thread Simon Hanna
it says to run fsck On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David C. Rankin < drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote: > On 05/23/2015 02:55 AM, Florian Pritz wrote: > >> On 23.05.2015 03:12, Francis Gerund wrote: >> >>> Am I correct to assume that this would ONLY affect systems that include a >>> RA

Re: [arch-general] RAID-0 kernel bug

2015-05-23 Thread Temlin Olivér
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 04:16:59AM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: > UUgh, dumb question, but... I have not used/configured this "discard", but I > do have 6 Raid0 arrays spinning on my Arch server. Does this corruption > potentially apply to me? Is this "discard" something that would be enabled > by

Re: [arch-general] pam upgrade and systemd

2015-05-23 Thread Alad Wenter
arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org schreef op 2015-05-19 14:00: Anyone have a system they haven't upgraded in ~24hrs to give it a further test, see if logins are broken after the pam upgrade? -te I've had similar issues, except it broke systemctl --user functionality. systemctl daemon-reexec

Re: [arch-general] pam upgrade and systemd

2015-05-23 Thread Jens Adam
Sat, 23 May 2015 13:39:00 +0200 Alad Wenter : > arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org schreef op 2015-05-19 14:00: > > > Anyone have a system they haven't upgraded in ~24hrs to give it a > > further test, see if logins are broken after the pam upgrade? > > > > -te > > I've had similar issues, exce

Re: [arch-general] pam upgrade and systemd

2015-05-23 Thread Alad Wenter
Sat, 23 May 2015 13:39:00 +0200 This isn't about downgrading or rebuilding, but rather about sub-par information. If you're upgrading a bunch of packages (your usual -Syu) with 'pam' being one of many and it's not echoing any hint or warning about a soname change, well, duh. PAM is such an essen

Re: [arch-general] pam upgrade and systemd

2015-05-23 Thread Troy Engel
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Jens Adam wrote: > > information. If you're upgrading a bunch of packages (your usual -Syu) > with 'pam' being one of many and it's not echoing any hint or warning > about a soname change, well, duh. PAM is such an essential library ...coupled with the fact I work