Hello,
I've lost content of /var, other partitions are ok, so system somewhat
boots up (to recovery mode).
What is the less pain method to get it again up and running? The problem I
see are pacman list of installed packages? Any other notes on what
important things could be missing?
Thank you ver
In a slim install, you're unlikely to have lost much due to the nature
of /var (only variable data, aka no "installed files"). If you had a
database on disk you did lose that, eg postgres. Also firewall rules
and all logs.
Try pacman -Ql | grep /var to see what owns stuff in there.
J. Leclanche
Or better, check with the command that tests all packages' files for presence.
# pacman -Qk | grep -v '0 missing files'
cheers!
mar77i
It might actually be easier to reinstall than to go through "pacmanning"
everything that's been lost, individually.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 3 Apr 2014, at 10:28, Martti Kühne wrote:
>
> Or better, check with the command that tests all packages' files for presence.
>
> # pacman -Qk | grep -v
Am 03.04.2014 11:28, schrieb Martti Kühne:
> Or better, check with the command that tests all packages' files for presence.
>
> # pacman -Qk | grep -v '0 missing files'
LOL. Where do you think that information is stored? I'll give you a
subtle hint: It's /var.
OP is basically screwed. There is n
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Daniel Rollin-Jones
wrote:
> It might actually be easier to reinstall than to go through "pacmanning"
> everything that's been lost, individually.
>
Do you mean `pacman -S $(pacman -Qq)`?
cheers!
mar77i
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 03.04.2014 11:28, schrieb Martti Kühne:
>> Or better, check with the command that tests all packages' files for
>> presence.
>>
>> # pacman -Qk | grep -v '0 missing files'
>
> LOL. Where do you think that information is stored? I'll give
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:09 PM, ProgAndy wrote:
> There may be a transparent proxy in your routing chain that strips
> compression in order to run a virus scan.
> The server sends these headers for haskell-core.db
> ( curl -I http://xsounds.org/~haskell/core/x86_64/haskell-core.db )
>
> Conten
On 04/03/2014 04:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 03.04.2014 05:24, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
...
Has anyone else experienced hangs in Firefox with the latest kernel?
None that I can remember.
I use firefox only lightly - however I too have not noticed any problems
with 3.14 from rc1 thro
On 03/04/14 05:22 AM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've lost content of /var, other partitions are ok, so system somewhat
> boots up (to recovery mode).
> What is the less pain method to get it again up and running? The problem I
> see are pacman list of installed packages? Any other notes on
2014-04-02 17:10 GMT-03:00 David C. Rankin :
>
> Thanks for the hard work, and so far, the sky hasn't fallen since the
> apache
> 2.4 update. Just don't get rid of mod_php, mod_fastcgi + php-fpm isn't a
> drop in
> replacement in all cases.
>
I am planning to publish a mod_php (php-zts) compati
The pacman database was in /var so there's little point in trying to reinstall
the same packages
What about software updates, security fixes, etc? ;-)
What is the less pain method to get it again up and running? The problem I
see are pacman list of installed packages?
Although you don't kno
On 03/04/14 01:36 PM, Nowaker wrote:
>> The pacman database was in /var so there's little point in trying to
>> reinstall the same packages
>
> What about software updates, security fixes, etc? ;-)
Which is why I'm suggesting a reinstall with pacstrap.
>> What is the less pain method to get it a
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've lost content of /var, other partitions are ok, so system somewhat
> boots up (to recovery mode).
> What is the less pain method to get it again up and running? The problem I
> see are pacman list of installed packages? Any othe
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 01:25:19PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:09 PM, ProgAndy wrote:
> > There may be a transparent proxy in your routing chain that strips
> > compression in order to run a virus scan.
> > The server sends these headers for haskell-core.db
> > ( curl
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:00:00PM -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 02/04/14 12:47 PM, Nowaker wrote:
> >> There may be a transparent proxy in your routing chain that strips
> >> compression in order to run a virus scan.
> >
> > Time for SSL-securing Arch Linux repos to prevent any sort of
> > man-
On 04/02/2014 11:10 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Having a few moments today to bring a production server up to date, I checked
www.archlinux.org for any current warnings about breakage or that user
interaction would be required for update. Finding none, I updated, and on reboot
Apache 2.4 was d
În ziua de Mie 02 Apr 2014, la 18:50:14, Daniel Micay a scris:
> Until then, you can use any sane LSM module without recompiling the
> kernel by building just the module you plan on using and loading it.
I'm no kernel hacker by any means but AFAIK the LSM framework is still there
with CONFIG_SECU
On 03/04/14 06:41 PM, Arthur Țițeică wrote:
> În ziua de Mie 02 Apr 2014, la 18:50:14, Daniel Micay a scris:
>> Until then, you can use any sane LSM module without recompiling the
>> kernel by building just the module you plan on using and loading it.
>
> I'm no kernel hacker by any means but AFAI
19 matches
Mail list logo
