[arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-11-19 Thread Caleb Cushing
I'm just curious as to why we're still on apache-2.2, at one point I think I assumed it was a php thing, but php-5.5 got lauched a bit ago and I can think of at least one php application I tried to run which wouldn't work on it, so that's probably not it. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.co

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-11-19 Thread Chris Down
On 2013-11-19 22:21:13 -0600, Caleb Cushing wrote: > I'm just curious as to why we're still on apache-2.2, at one point I think > I assumed it was a php thing, but php-5.5 got lauched a bit ago and I can > think of at least one php application I tried to run which wouldn't work on > it, so that's p

Re: [arch-general] apache 2.4

2013-11-19 Thread William Giokas
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:46:55PM +0800, Chris Down wrote: > On 2013-11-19 22:21:13 -0600, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > I'm just curious as to why we're still on apache-2.2, at one point I think > > I assumed it was a php thing, but php-5.5 got lauched a bit ago and I can > > think of at least one php