There is a slight change in behaviour. When preforming an update, all
c32 modules in /usr/lib/syslinux/bios/ will get copied/symlinked.
Previously we only updated/copied modules that were already in
/boot/syslinux.
Patches can also be found here:
http://pyther.net/archlinux/syslinux/6/20130706
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/06/2013 02:00, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 28.06.2013 20:02, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> Am 22.06.2013 21:19, schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> I'd say we include this script into the releng scripts
> (either archiso or create a nwe package; atm I
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:26:53 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
>> I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a
>> 32-bit system.
>> After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in
>> /boot/syslinux didn't get updat
Am 05.07.2013 20:46, schrieb Jonathan Hudson:
> And if you have a custom syslinux.cfg, you need to restore than from
> syslinux.cfg.pacsave.
>
> So many ways to break your boot
That has already been fixed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;
> Patches can also be found here:
> http://pyther.net/archlinux/syslinux/6/20130706/
>
> Matthew Gyurgyik
>
> PKGBUILD:
> --- /tmp/syslinux/PKGBUILD 2013-07-06 08:55:21.0 -0400
> +++ syslinux/PKGBUILD 2013-07-06 07:45:18.811510802 -0400
>
Hello,
I've wondered why no one upgraded Apache to 2.4 after being available
for so long. Then I stumbled upon an answer on this list where it has
been said that 2.4 breaks too many packages [1].
I've taken some time to verify what does it break, and fixed all
packages from [extra] and [community
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've wondered why no one upgraded Apache to 2.4 after being available
> for so long. Then I stumbled upon an answer on this list where it has
> been said that 2.4 breaks too many packages [1].
>
> I've taken some time to verify what does
7 matches
Mail list logo
