On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:08:43AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Of course bullshit is also rife and quite amusing sometimes. The same
> pro audio world sells £10,000 gold power cables as thick as your arm and
> then plugs them into a standard copper wall socket.
Nobody in the pro audio world fa
Ok, I know a lot of you cynics would say: "it's fine, why would do you want
Nepomuk running anyways!?"
The truth is my laptop HD went dead some days ago so I had to restore my
system from a 2-weeks old backup; I usually use fsarchiver to backup root
partition and 7z to compress ~/.kde4 so this way
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 02:08 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> The same pro audio world sells £10,000 gold power cables as thick as
> your arm and then plugs them into a standard copper wall socket.
>
No, that are rich consumers. I don't think that all of those consumers
are stupid audiophiles, I gue
Hi,
Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
as a pure news, no opinions[1].
Of course, after reading all the discussions on the mailing lists, my
feeling after reading the link? Mwuhahahaha.
Important quotes from the link ( which I hope do not alter the contex
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:50:16 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case
> you haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we
> can drop that support entirely.)"
Lennart in topform again...:( Well if that's the official sta
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> Too bad, we are either going to have to fork or look for an alternative to
> udev.
>
When upstream udev fails to live up to some distributions (see, Ubuntu, for
example) it *will* be forked.
Hopefully, udev-systemd and udev-ng (or whate
> Not that the pro audio world doesn't have its own share
> of nonsense, but it's different nonsense.
Yeah but that stuff is usually just irritating but the audiophile
example is a little funny without explanation.
--
___
'Writ
> > I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
> > violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set forth by the
> > co worker of the designer of C and Unix as it not only dynamically
> > creates devices like mdev does but also hotplugging like hotplugd on
> > Open
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 12:21 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > Not that the pro audio world doesn't have its own share
> > of nonsense, but it's different nonsense.
>
> Yeah but that stuff is usually just irritating but the audiophile
> example is a little funny without explanation.
One hand washes
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we want
> to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the time
> though. OK, flames away I guess :)
Nobody to blame when we do not listen BSD folks and have
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
>>> I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
>>> violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set fort
On 08/13/2012 02:12 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
violates the "one thing and do it well" principle set forth by the
co worker of the designer of C and Unix as it not only dynamic
On 08/13/2012 07:50 AM, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:34:26 +0200
Joakim Hernberg wrote:
Alternatively we will all be running systemd one day whether we want
to or not :( I suspect that this has been the game plan all the time
though. OK, flames away I guess :)
Nobody to blame when we
On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
I've been wondering lately whether there is a good reason why even udev
violates the "one thi
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 08:59 -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:56 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >>> On Aug 13, 2012 3:17 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" wrote:
> I've been wondering la
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> as a pure news, no opinions[1].
>
> Of course, after reading all the discussions on the mailing lists, my
> feeling after reading the link? Mwuhah
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While building an Arch-based wireless router I ran into a problem of
> persistent NIC naming. To differentiate which interfaces go to WAN and LAN,
> I have created a simple udev rule like this
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-network.ru
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:11 +0530, gt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0530, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> > as a pure news, no opinions[1].
> >
> > Of course, after reading all the discussions on the
> I see that linus torvalds will have competition pretty soon on who gets
> to be the overlord. Or maybe they can coexist, one in kernel land and
> the other in userspace land ;)
linus used to run binaries from his earliest days just to make sure
that they still worked and constantly iterates that
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> It's said a fundamental problem with user space development is
> that often new projects are started because feature X is easier when
> starting from scratch and so your swapping rather than developing. Is
> that the case here or was there
On 13 August 2012 16:04, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:08:43AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>
>> Of course bullshit is also rife and quite amusing sometimes. The same
>> pro audio world sells Ł10,000 gold power cables as thick as your arm and
>> then plugs them into a standar
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
soldering joints are ok. It's less expensive, since in Germany we've got
an online retailer who sells equipment for less money.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
>
> Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
> soldering joints are ok. It's less expensive, since in Germany we'
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:50:16 +0530
Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
> *wall of text*
I, for one, welcome our new red hatted underlings.
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 18:20 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> >> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
> >
> > Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if th
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> For professional usage cables usually have to be self-made. Btw. I once
> asked if Neutrik plastic cable relief does crumble all over the world
> after a while at LAU or LAD. Yes, they do. I switched to Rean.
Which is Neutrik made i
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 23:49 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>>> Otherwise, we usually make our own cables.
>>
>> Private I sometimes buy ready to use cables, I just check if the
>>
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 16:35 +, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > For professional usage cables usually have to be self-made. Btw. I once
> > asked if Neutrik plastic cable relief does crumble all over the world
> > after a while at LA
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 19:38 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
>> Actually, that's one point where PA is right (even though it's
>> wrong on a lot of other points): doing it like (2) avoids amplifying
>> the quantification noise if the sound card applies the master gain
>>
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
wrote:
> Another flame may start here, but I would like to present the following
> as a pure news, no opinions[1].
You're free to post this, but don't for one second pretend that it is
anything, but flame bait.
=-Jameson
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> 16 bit means that there are 2^16 possible values for a sample. So the
> signal is quantised to the nearest level. Except in some special cases,
> the error (a rounding error) is random and appears as noise. For a
> 16-bit card, that noise will have a level that is 98 dB low
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:53 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Two points:
>
> - You don't readjust the master continuously, but you don't
> add/remove sources on the fly either. You adjust the master in the
> beginning when you setup your system, but the reason you can do that
> is becaus
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:33:41PM +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > 16 bit means that there are 2^16 possible values for a sample. So the
> > signal is quantised to the nearest level. Except in some special cases,
> > the error (a rounding error) is random and appears
On 08/06/2012 06:07 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
This may be resolved upstream[1]:
gene
=== From lkml ==
I'm re-releasing the iproute2 tools for 3.5.0 kernel.
There were a couple of bugs (one serious) in the 3.5.0 version.
...
Mike Frysinger (1):
Fix regression
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:33 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> I doubt those use 16 bits input. Even low-end hi-fi digital
> recorders support 24 bits, which gives -72dB for the noise and
> starts indeed to be acceptable. But most end-user will simply set
> their system to "CD quality" (or leave it
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 20:33 +0200, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> > I doubt those use 16 bits input. Even low-end hi-fi digital
> > recorders support 24 bits, which gives -72dB for the noise and
> > starts indeed to be acceptable. But most end-u
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 06:07 PM, Myra Nelson wrote:
>
>
> This may be resolved upstream[1]:
>
> gene
>
> === From lkml ==
> I'm re-releasing the iproute2 tools for 3.5.0 kernel.
>
> There were a couple of bugs (one seri
On 13 August 2012 06:29, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Nevermind, solved after reinstalling full MySQL stack.
--
-msx
On 13 August 2012 21:36, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> Some chips work better at e.g. 96KHz, it doesn't depend to the KHz,
> simply to the chip.
>
I always thought that these high sampling frequencies are used to
avoid aliasing without need for a
39 matches
Mail list logo
