Hi,
When using systemd to handle suspend, it doesn't run hooks in
/etc/pm/sleep.d/ which work when running "pm-suspend".
My hook is called 01custom and is executable.
Is it incapable of handing these suspend/resume scripts or does it
have its own method?
Thanks,
jsteel
Hi guys,
Today I noticed a bunch of the following (kinda scary) errors on boot:
Attempted to remove disk file system, and we can't allow that.
rm_rf(/tmp): Operation not permitted
And my /tmp is not cleaned up. I guess this is caused by the
systemd-tmpfiles. I'm using initscripts. I use separate
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:50 AM, jsteel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using systemd to handle suspend, it doesn't run hooks in
> /etc/pm/sleep.d/ which work when running "pm-suspend".
>
> My hook is called 01custom and is executable.
>
> Is it incapable of handing these suspend/resume scripts or does it
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:19 AM, David Benfell
wrote:
> It turns out I do need KillSignal= for my memcached jobs. But when I
> include it in the service file it complains:
>
> Unknown lvalue 'Kill-Signal' in section 'Service'. Ignoring.
Probably because it's "KillSignal", not "Kill-Signal".
--
in the install boot loader step I noticed speakup was not mentioned in any
of the append lines for btrfs when the configuration file was put into the
editor. Will speakup=soft added to the append line enable a talking arch
linux installation given everything else was done on the arch linux
ins
Sorry if this is dragging up an old topic, but I've been poking around
AIF as I'm interested in possibly (hopefully) bringing it up to speed
and/or improving it, and I noticed that it's still in the repos, but
isn't installable by anyone who doesn't happen to have grub legacy still
installed on th
On Jul 28, 2012 8:19 AM, "Myra Nelson" wrote:
>
> Tom:
>
> From your latest update to the initscripts in the git repo.
>
> This makes sure that systemd supports some initscripts API's. With this
> patch, systemd will:
>
> * Parse and use DAEMONS and MODULES from rc.conf
> * Run rc.l
On 28/07/12 13:04, Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is dragging up an old topic, but I've been poking around
> AIF as I'm interested in possibly (hopefully) bringing it up to speed
> and/or improving it, and I noticed that it's still in the repos, but
> isn't installable by anyone who doesn
On Jul 28, 2012 10:00 AM, "Lukas Jirkovsky" wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> Today I noticed a bunch of the following (kinda scary) errors on boot:
>
> Attempted to remove disk file system, and we can't allow that.
> rm_rf(/tmp): Operation not permitted
>
> And my /tmp is not cleaned up. I guess this is caus
On 28 July 2012 13:22, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
> This is probably a bug. Please file a report. A check was added to avoid
> accidentally deleting /, I guess it was too strict.
>
> Tom
OK, I filled it as FS#30893
Lukas
So now that rc.conf was split and the change pushed to the stable repos
I have been doing the necessary changes in my system.
One problem I have found is that it is not clear how I can configure the
system to load (in my case) pt-latin9 and compose.latin1 automatically.
This is needed to be able t
Anyway problem solved downgrading avr glibc to 1.7..
I'll have to download a newer copy of the talking arch disk among other
things that takes account of pacstrap and uses the arch scripts rather
than the framework to install archlinux. The braille instructions I made
are also outdated so I'll fix that after some reading. Earlier this
morning I
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:04:37 -0400
Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is dragging up an old topic, but I've been poking around
> AIF as I'm interested in possibly (hopefully) bringing it up to speed
> and/or improving it, and I noticed that it's still in the repos, but
> isn't installable b
On 28/07/12 17:52, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I'll have to download a newer copy of the talking arch disk among other
> things that takes account of pacstrap and uses the arch scripts rather
> than the framework to install archlinux. The braille instructions I made
> are also outdated so I'll fix t
Am 28.07.2012 17:52, schrieb Jude DaShiell:
> I'll have to download a newer copy of the talking arch disk among other
> things that takes account of pacstrap and uses the arch scripts rather
> than the framework to install archlinux. The braille instructions I made
> are also outdated so I'll f
All,
Downloading the archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso from
http://cake.lib.fit.edu/archlinux/iso/2012.07.15/, the md5sums.txt files shows:
a40c60ce93efb9dfd9a7353310fed35a archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso
However, I get:
cc979f9ce51a0ffac73b1f60437ffea6 archlinux-2012.07.15-
Leonid Isaev writes:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:04:37 -0400
> Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry if this is dragging up an old topic, but I've been poking around
>> AIF as I'm interested in possibly (hopefully) bringing it up to speed
>> and/or improving it, and I noticed that it's still in the
According to Pierre Schmitz:
#Chris Brannon just released a new iso of the talking arch system:
#http://the-brannons.com/tarch/
The wiki instructions for installing the Talking Arch system have also been
updated here[1]. With the exception of a couple of things you need to do with
Speakup to e
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:20 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> Downloading the archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso from
> http://cake.lib.fit.edu/archlinux/iso/2012.07.15/, the md5sums.txt files
> shows:
>
> a40c60ce93efb9dfd9a7353310fed35a archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2012 02:28 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>
> Probably because it's "KillSignal", not "Kill-Signal".
>
Thanks! I'm about to head out the door, but I've corrected the service
files accordingly.
- --
David Benfell
benf...@parts-unknown.org
On 07/28/2012 12:49 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>
> i tried from the same site you posted. the md5sums file is correct.
> you'd better try again.
>
> regards,
>
Thank you Auguste!
I pulled again from http://mirrors.xmission.com/archlinux/iso/2012.07.15 and
got the correct checksum. Glad I check
On 07/26/2012 09:39 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> You'd want to check the gimp-user list I think, but if I recall
> correctly (from reading the list over the last few weeks) this is the
> new behaviour for 2.8. I don't use the sliders the way you describe,
> though.
Thanks, that is what I figured. The gi
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> I don't know if the graphics card you are using supports video decoding
> acceleration and if skype can make use of it, but at least here with the
> ati binary blob, I can only get video decoding acceleration for one
> video stream at a time,
As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions
here, the only advantages systemd offers are:
- Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of
the configuration files
- Daemon supervision
- Bootup speedup by parallelizing the daemons.
However, from the respon
Hi,
I can't remember to have changed anything critical in the last couple of
days/weeks on this system, therefore I suppose it has something to do
with some updates.
Since a couple of days I no more got an console on tty0 with systemd.
tty1 - tty6 work fine, but tty0 just displays the dialog to e
* Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions
> here, the only advantages systemd offers are:
> - Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of
> the configuration files
> - Daemon supervision
> - Bootup speedup by paralleliz
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't remember to have changed anything critical in the last couple of
> days/weeks on this system, therefore I suppose it has something to do
> with some updates.
>
> Since a couple of days I no more got an console on tty0 with sy
Hi,
Am 29.07.2012 00:20, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
> tty0? How exactly do you switch to it?
Ctrl+Alt+F1.
> One cannot have a console on /dev/tty0, sine it's not a real tty but
> only a pointer to the currently activated console.
Ok, maybe the terminology I've used is wrong. However I'm talking
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.07.2012 00:20, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
>> tty0? How exactly do you switch to it?
>
> Ctrl+Alt+F1.
That's tty1.
Try enabling getty@tty1.service:
ln -sf /usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service \
/etc/systemd/sys
Hi,
Can systemd run a bash script at/after boot without having to install
initscripts-systemd for compatibility with rc.local? I assume
initscripts-systemd will be depreciated eventually so wonder if there
is a native way to do this, or if this is the workaround for now.
Thanks,
jsteel
Hi,
Am 29.07.2012 00:56, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
> Try enabling getty@tty1.service:
Unfortunately this didn't work. It was enabled already anyway.
By the way: systemctl shows that it is enabled, but it is also dead for
whatever reason :(.
[root@vpcs ~]# systemctl status getty@tty1.service
get
You can create a service that runs your shell script at boot.
I think it would be something like this:
/etc/systemd/system/a-name-you-want.service
[Unit]
Description=a-name-you-want
[Service]
ExecStart=/path-to-your-script
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
2012/7/28 jsteel
> Hi,
>
> Can
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> As far as I can tell from the systemd blog and people's reactions
> here, the only advantages systemd offers are:
> - Splitting the configuration files, which increases the robustness of
> the configuration files
> - Daemon supervision
>
Guys,
Does archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall have the dmraid modules and executable
that were missing in archlinux-2011.08.19-netinstall?
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Yes.
Leonardo Dagnino
2012/7/28 David C. Rankin
> Guys,
>
> Does archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall have the dmraid modules and
> executable
> that were missing in archlinux-2011.08.19-netinstall?
>
> --
> David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
>
Hey guys…
I haven’t seen so far any .service file to allow minbif to be executed
with systemd scheme rather than initscripts. This is a solution I tried
myself and seems to work so I decided to share. It consists of the
.service file for systemd and a .conf file for tmpfiles.d so that
/run/minbif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2012 04:10 PM, jsteel wrote:
>
> Can systemd run a bash script at/after boot without having to
> install initscripts-systemd for compatibility with rc.local? I
> assume initscripts-systemd will be depreciated eventually so wonder
> if there i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2012 02:20 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
>
> In sum, systemd offers some benefits that are covered by other
> programs and patches, while drawing much controversy and exacting a
> toll which seems a bit too large in the eyes of some users. F
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Karol Babioch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 29.07.2012 00:56, schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
>> Try enabling getty@tty1.service:
>
> Unfortunately this didn't work. It was enabled already anyway.
the link isn't broken, right? pointing to, say, /lib/systemd/...
what happens if y
40 matches
Mail list logo
