Hi,
I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own
posts to mailinglists?
I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown.
Thunderbird does not have this issue.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.a
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:16:57 +0200
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see
> own posts to mailinglists?
> I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown.
> Thunderbird does not have this issue.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
I have
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own
> posts to mailinglists?
> I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown.
> Thunderbird does not have this issue.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own
> > posts to mailinglists?
> > I'm using gmail imap and somehow my own posts are not shown.
>
Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see own
>>> posts to mailinglists?
>>> I'm using gmail imap and so
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski
wrote:
> Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt:
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to
Using claws-mail for a year and still do not know that my own posts can
be displayed in thread.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:16:57 +0200
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a big problem with claws-mail, is it somehow possible to see
> own posts to mailinglists?
> I'm using gmail imap and somehow
> When you send message to mailing list with gmail smtp, you don't
> receive a copy of your sent mail. It is the same as with webinterface.
>
> http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=6588
This is not true sending through webinterface works as tbird works.
I skip inbox and put new
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> last time I installed arch on a virtual machine, I was unable to install
> grub2.
> one google search later I put the mbr gap of 2MiB back in place and everything
> went smoothly. 2MiB isn't much by today's standards, and if the software says
> Indeed it is easy to put a gap between the MBR and the first partition
> when partitioning from scratch - the main issue is for anyone with a
> pre-existing (non-linux) partition at the start of the hard drive
> containing an OEM installed Windows system or HPA recovery area or
> similar
You ca
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:58:19 +0300
Vytautas Stankevičius wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski
> wrote:
> > Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt:
> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:16:57AM +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:05:20 +0200
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > When you send message to mailing list with gmail smtp, you don't
> > receive a copy of your sent mail. It is the same as with webinterface.
> >
> > http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=6588
> This is not true sen
Am 19.07.2012 16:40, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:58:19 +0300
> Vytautas Stankevičius wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Tobias Powalowski
>> wrote:
>>> Am 19.07.2012 09:45, schrieb gt:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 01:07:40PM +0530, gt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 201
Hi List,
when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
follow the same steps as if there would be no old version on my machine
and pacman takes care of everything?
--
cheers,
Thorsten
On 19/07/12 17:13, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
> package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
> follow the same steps as if there would be no old version on my machine
> and pacman takes care of
On Thursday 19 Jul 2012 17:13:44 Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
> package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
> follow the same steps as if there would be no old version on my machine
> and pacman
On 07/19/2012 12:18 PM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jul 2012 17:13:44 Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
Hi List,
when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
follow the same steps as if there would be no old
Jonathan Dlouhy writes:
> On 07/19/2012 12:18 PM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>> On Thursday 19 Jul 2012 17:13:44 Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>>> Hi List,
>>>
>>> when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
>>> package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
>>> fo
Thorsten Jolitz on Thu, 2012/07/19 18:44:
> [...] So this would render my git-clone of the AUR repo superfluous, [...]
Oh, wait! Is AUR accessible via git? That would be really great!
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris
On 07/19/2012 09:52 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
Thorsten Jolitz on Thu, 2012/07/19 18:44:
[...] So this would render my git-clone of the AUR repo superfluous, [...]
Oh, wait! Is AUR accessible via git? That would be really great!
From the wiki:
Git Repo
A Git Repo of the AUR is maintained
Don deJuan on Thu, 2012/07/19 09:53:
> On 07/19/2012 09:52 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Thorsten Jolitz on Thu, 2012/07/19 18:44:
> >> [...] So this would render my git-clone of the AUR repo superfluous,
> >> [...]
> >
> > Oh, wait! Is AUR accessible via git? That would be really great!
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
> On 19/07/12 17:13, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
>> package - do I have to remove the old version first, or do I simply
>> follow the same steps as if there
Hello all,
I also experienced initial problems getting the new glibc 2.16.0-2 to
work. In my case, the problem was an older version of lib32-glibc (I
think I had version 2.14.x installed, sorry can't remember exactly).
After enabling the multilib repo in /etc/pacman.conf and doing
sudo pacman -Sy
Alex Belanger said the following at 07/18/2012 05:27 AM :
> pacman -Syu --ignore glibc pacman -Su
> I had the same problem, went to archlinux website and they say exactly what
> you need to do and why. You shouldn't toy with it yourself, nor use the
> --force option. Try this, if it doesn't work,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/12 16:42, D. R. Evans wrote:
>
> pacman -Syu --ignore filesystem && pacman -S filesystem --force
>
>
>
> and that gives:
>
>
>
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) glibc: /lib
> exists in filesystem Errors o
D. R. Evans [2012.07.19 1742 -0600]:
> Alex Belanger said the following at 07/18/2012 05:27 AM :
> > pacman -Syu --ignore glibc pacman -Su
>
> > I had the same problem, went to archlinux website and they say exactly what
> > you need to do and why. You shouldn't toy with it yourself, nor use the
>
2012/7/20 Christian Hesse :
> Don deJuan on Thu, 2012/07/19 09:53:
>> On 07/19/2012 09:52 AM, Christian Hesse wrote:
>> > Thorsten Jolitz on Thu, 2012/07/19 18:44:
>> >> [...] So this would render my git-clone of the AUR repo superfluous,
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > Oh, wait! Is AUR accessible via git?
On Thursday 19 Jul 2012 18:44:13 Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Jonathan Dlouhy writes:
>
> > On 07/19/2012 12:18 PM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> >> On Thursday 19 Jul 2012 17:13:44 Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> >>> Hi List,
> >>>
> >>> when I want to install a new version from an already installed AUR
> >>> pa
Does anyone know if haveged significantly affects things like
truecrypt, cryptsetup, RSA, or SSL if you happen to leave the daemon
running for long periods of time? I'm sure that it's always going to
be "random enough", but I often make use of Archlinux in forensic
environments involving encrypted
[2012-07-19 22:10:05 -0700] David Hunter:
> I'm sure that it's always going to
> be "random enough", but I often make use of Archlinux in forensic
> environments involving encrypted disks and files or transferring
> things over SSL, so I do need to know if there is even a theoretical
> weakness in
Hello,
I have already been used to not beeing able to suspend my MacBook Pro
since the buggy nvidia version which came with 3.4.x kernel. But as of
the latest updates which brought kernel 3.4.5-1 I am not able to use
pm-hibernate anymore.
When looking into /var/log/pm-suspend.log it seems that hib
31 matches
Mail list logo
